Resources: Blogs

A “landmark deal” for women’s sport

Blogs
|

Netball Collective Playing Agreement Takes Centre Court

There has been much attention on the new Netball Australia collective agreement (the Agreement) announced last week. The Agreement, described as a “landmark deal” for women’s sport increases the minimum player salary from $13,250 per year to $27,375 per year.

There has been much attention on the new Netball Australia collective agreement (the Agreement) announced last week. The Agreement, described as a “landmark deal” for women’s sport, increases the minimum player salary from $13,250 per year to $27,375 per year.

In what is seen as a move toward professionalism for the sport, all National Netball League players will now be signed to a 12 month part-time contract for an average of 20 hours per week. This was viewed as a significant achievement as often other professional sporting contracts provide that an athlete is employed on casual basis (and therefore not entitled to leave or other entitlements). Players will be given “protected hours” between 10am and 4pm to allow them to engage in additional work or pursue studies.

In addition, a parental care policy for players with children under 12 months of age will now be provided. Players (employed under the Agreement) who return to the sport after having a child will be provided with the assistance of a carer when they are required to travel with their children.

Interestingly, the issue of child care for female athletes was highlighted in the discrimination complaint by a former member of the Australian women’s national football team against Football Federation Australia (FFA). While the discrimination claim was ultimately found by the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal to be without basis, FFA came under scrutiny when it refused to cover the costs incurred by the player to have her mother accompany her to take care of her 11 month old baby.

Other benefits reached under the Agreement now available to players include the cost of private health insurance (up to $1,500 per year) and income protection for earnings up to two years due to injury or pregnancy.

Commentators have argued that the “landmark deal” will place pressure on other women’s sport competitions, including the W-League, Women’s Big Bash League and the AFL Women’s League to increase the minimum salary available to players.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Workplace Law evolves

In 2003, Workplace Law was born. We were one of the first law firms to exclusively advise and act for employers...our tagline at the time said it all “Your partner in workplace relations”.

Read more...

Rugby league player obtains injunction against employing Club

The Penrith Panthers have been in the headlines recently due to an employment dispute with one of their players, Taylan May.

Read more...

Why clubs need to regulate fan and member behaviour at sporting events

Have a seat and take a stand

Racial abuse from fans and/or members certainly falls foul of discrimination laws and can lead to significant questions being asked of clubs and organisations about what steps they took or could have reasonably taken to prevent players from being subject to such behaviour.

Read more...

First Intractable bargaining order made by the Full Bench

How did it end?

Enterprise agreement making under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires bargaining representatives to bargain in good faith. Under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth), the Fair Work Commission was provided with new powers to arbitrate and issue a workplace determination to resolve intractable disputes about terms and conditions of proposed enterprise agreement in circumstances where there are no reasonable prospects of the parties reaching an agreement.

Read more...

Federal Court finds employee was not demoted due to his exercise of workplace rights

The final decision

Employees are protected from adverse action because they have exercised, or propose to exercise, the workplace right to make a “complaint” or “inquiry” in relation to their employment within the meaning of section 341(1)(c)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Employer successfully rebuts presumption in adverse action claim

Return to sender

An employer has successfully defended an adverse action claim brought by a former employee as the court was satisfied that the employee was not dismissed for a prohibited reason.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.