Resources: Blogs

The real employees (of Melbourne)

Blogs
|

Advertising for female only staff

In an attempt to reduce the gender imbalance in Melbourne University’s School of Mathematics and Statistics, the University is now advertising three permanent positions exclusively for female applicants only.

In an attempt to reduce the gender imbalance in Melbourne University’s School of Mathematics and Statistics, the University is now advertising three permanent positions exclusively for female applicants only.

This raises some interesting points of discussion about discrimination laws in Australia. There are a number of laws in Australia applicable to discrimination in employment on the basis of gender including the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth), Equal Opportunity Act 2010 (Vic) and the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). Generally speaking this legislation renders it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against a person when determining who should be offered employment on the basis of a protected attribute, such as gender.

However, anti discrimination laws also allow for “positive discrimination” and permits measures to be introduced in pursuit of promoting or creating substantive equality for members of a group with a particular attribute.

In the University’s case, the decision to exclusively open the applications purely for female applicants is with the intention to promote change and reduce the gender imbalance in the School of Mathematics and Statistics. The University is aware that females are underrepresented in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics and by advertising for female applicants it hopes to address the imbalance. Currently, only about a quarter of all mathematics academics in Australia are female.

These measures are referred to generally as “special measures” and in some jurisdictions require an application to use the special measures to be approved. To have an application approved, the person seeking to introduce the measures must be able to be prove that it is for the purposes of achieving equality. The actions also need to be justified to show that members of the group (i.e. female academics in this example) have a particular need for advancement or assistance.

In Victoria, employers do not need to apply to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal for approval of “special measures”. However, NSW employers seeking to implement “special measures” need to apply to the Anti Discrimination Board to get an approval prior to advertising for a position.

Employers are also reminded that the deadline for reporting to Workplace Gender Equality Agency is fast approaching (31 May 2016).

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Employer unlawfully discriminated against employee with breastfeeding responsibilities

It’s a tent-s situation

There are a number of personal attributes that are protected by Australia’s federal and state anti-discrimination laws, such as a person’s race, sex, pregnancy, marital status, family responsibilities, breastfeeding, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity or intersex status.

Read more...

Managing Injured Employees - A Guide for Employers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an injured employee.

Read more...

Hiring in the Hybrid Workplace

The first of our 2022 webinars focused on the employment 'life cycle'. This webinar will cover key legal and HR issues to consider throughout the recruitment process.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

Finishing up employee in notice period amounted to termination

Until it’s time for you to go

Employers often do not require (or desire) employees to work through their notice period. This is particularly the case if an employee has provided resignation of their employment and are disruptive to the workplace.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.