Resources: Blog

The value of pre-employment medical examinations

Blog
|

All PEMs should be specifically tailored, as different jobs have different requirements

Organisations have obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees. One way for organisations to manage the risks is by making use of pre-employment medicals (PEMs).

Organisations have obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees. One way for organisations to manage the risks is by making use of pre-employment medicals (PEMs).

For an organisation to utilise PEMs effectively it is important they understand:

  • The purpose for the assessment – why do you need to perform the PEM?
  • What is to be achieved from the PEM?
  • Is the correct PEM test being utilised to determine the information required?
  • Is the medical assessment/s in breach of anti discrimination laws?

The primary reason PEMs are conducted is to help an organisation ensure the person selected to perform the role is able to meet the inherent requirements of the role. In Duncan v Kembla Watertech Pty Ltd [2011] NSWADT 176, Ms Duncan was offered a position on the condition she satisfactorily completed a pre-employment medical. At the pre-employment medical Ms Duncan was found to have suffered from a number of medical conditions that would make it difficult for her to cope with the physical demands of the role. Relying on the medical practitioner’s opinion, Kembla Watertech advised Ms Duncan she was disqualified on the basis that she was unable to perform the essential parts of the job safely.

Ms Duncan lodged a complaint to the NSW Anti Discrimination Board which she alleged that Kembla Watertech had unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of disability, under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). In this case, it was determined that there was no unlawful discrimination because Ms Duncan’s disabilities rendered her unfit to perform the inherent requirements of the role and Ms Duncan’s complaint was dismissed.

Employers need to ensure that the candidate is able to perform the inherent requirements of the job role without risk of injury to themselves or their potential co-workers.

For a candidate, a PEM should be seen as an opportunity to fully and honestly inform their potential employer about any relevant medical conditions/injuries.

It also demonstrates that their potential employer places a value on their safety and the safety of others and that there is no risk of injury when the duties are performed. Further a PEM may detect a relevant medical condition that was not previously detected.

All PEMs should be specifically tailored, as different jobs have different requirements. For example, some employers may opt to utilise pre employment psychological screening to assess intelligence, personality, aptitude and skills – this type of medical can be used to determine whether or not the particular candidate exhibits behaviours or characteristics that are inconsistent with the culture of the organisation or the role requirements.

It is important that organisations comply with relevant legislation when adopting PEMs, particularly, anti-discrimination legislation. If your organisation is conducting PEMs make sure they do not expose your organisation to possible legal action by way of a discrimination complaint or a workers compensation claim.

In a future blog post we will discuss how your organisation should best manage the information it receives as part of a PEM.

 

Similar articles

Company vicariously liable for injury resulting from skylarking supervisor

All in good fun

Enjoying the company of your colleagues is something most people hope to find in the workplace. It can make work much more enjoyable and lead to lasting friendships. However, fun in the workplace can cross a line when it takes the form of dangerous skylarking or roughhousing.

Read more...

Brisbane company first to be convicted of industrial manslaughter

Brisbane company first to be convicted of industrial manslaughter

Workplace fatalities are tragic and devastating events. In order to reflect the seriousness of these incidents, some jurisdictions across Australia have amended their work health and safety laws to establish the offence of industrial manslaughter, where the negligent conduct by a person conducting a business or undertaking or officers causes the death of a worker.

Read more...

Employer’s disciplinary process didn’t force resignation

I'll go first

The commencement of a disciplinary process against an employee is not an insignificant matter. It serves to notify an employee that their employer has serious concerns about their employment; whether that is the standard of the employee’s performance, their conduct or their behaviour.

Read more...

The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.

Read more...

Notice of termination in the employment contract

Put it in writing

When it comes to engaging new employees or promoting existing employees, it is crucial that employers prepare and review contracts of employment to ensure that they accurately reflect the terms which will govern an employee’s employment.

Read more...

Termination of employment letters

In your letter

A termination of employment letter serves a significant purpose in bringing the employment relationship to an end.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.