Resources: Blogs

All PEMs should be specifically tailored, as different jobs have different requirements

Blogs
|

The value of pre-employment medical examinations

Organisations have obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees. One way for organisations to manage the risks is by making use of pre-employment medicals (PEMs).

Organisations have obligations to ensure the health and safety of their employees. One way for organisations to manage the risks is by making use of pre-employment medicals (PEMs).

For an organisation to utilise PEMs effectively it is important they understand:

  • The purpose for the assessment – why do you need to perform the PEM?
  • What is to be achieved from the PEM?
  • Is the correct PEM test being utilised to determine the information required?
  • Is the medical assessment/s in breach of anti discrimination laws?

The primary reason PEMs are conducted is to help an organisation ensure the person selected to perform the role is able to meet the inherent requirements of the role. In Duncan v Kembla Watertech Pty Ltd [2011] NSWADT 176, Ms Duncan was offered a position on the condition she satisfactorily completed a pre-employment medical. At the pre-employment medical Ms Duncan was found to have suffered from a number of medical conditions that would make it difficult for her to cope with the physical demands of the role. Relying on the medical practitioner’s opinion, Kembla Watertech advised Ms Duncan she was disqualified on the basis that she was unable to perform the essential parts of the job safely.

Ms Duncan lodged a complaint to the NSW Anti Discrimination Board which she alleged that Kembla Watertech had unlawfully discriminated against her on the basis of disability, under the Anti Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW). In this case, it was determined that there was no unlawful discrimination because Ms Duncan’s disabilities rendered her unfit to perform the inherent requirements of the role and Ms Duncan’s complaint was dismissed.

Employers need to ensure that the candidate is able to perform the inherent requirements of the job role without risk of injury to themselves or their potential co-workers.

For a candidate, a PEM should be seen as an opportunity to fully and honestly inform their potential employer about any relevant medical conditions/injuries.

It also demonstrates that their potential employer places a value on their safety and the safety of others and that there is no risk of injury when the duties are performed. Further a PEM may detect a relevant medical condition that was not previously detected.

All PEMs should be specifically tailored, as different jobs have different requirements. For example, some employers may opt to utilise pre employment psychological screening to assess intelligence, personality, aptitude and skills – this type of medical can be used to determine whether or not the particular candidate exhibits behaviours or characteristics that are inconsistent with the culture of the organisation or the role requirements.

It is important that organisations comply with relevant legislation when adopting PEMs, particularly, anti-discrimination legislation. If your organisation is conducting PEMs make sure they do not expose your organisation to possible legal action by way of a discrimination complaint or a workers compensation claim.

In a future blog post we will discuss how your organisation should best manage the information it receives as part of a PEM.

 

Similar articles

Industrial manslaughter offence introduced in New South Wales

On 20 June 2024, the New South Wales Parliament passed legislation to include a new criminal offence of industrial manslaughter under work health and safety legislation.

Read more...

Safety regulator strategy focuses on psychosocial risks

Earlier this month, SafeWork NSW announced a three-year work health and safety strategy focusing on psychological health and safety.

Read more...

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Read more...

First Intractable bargaining order made by the Full Bench

How did it end?

Enterprise agreement making under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires bargaining representatives to bargain in good faith. Under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth), the Fair Work Commission was provided with new powers to arbitrate and issue a workplace determination to resolve intractable disputes about terms and conditions of proposed enterprise agreement in circumstances where there are no reasonable prospects of the parties reaching an agreement.

Read more...

Federal Court finds employee was not demoted due to his exercise of workplace rights

The final decision

Employees are protected from adverse action because they have exercised, or propose to exercise, the workplace right to make a “complaint” or “inquiry” in relation to their employment within the meaning of section 341(1)(c)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Employer successfully rebuts presumption in adverse action claim

Return to sender

An employer has successfully defended an adverse action claim brought by a former employee as the court was satisfied that the employee was not dismissed for a prohibited reason.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.