Resources: Blogs

Fly, eagle, fly


Lessons from the Manly Sea Eagles head coach resignation saga

The NRL’s Manly Sea Eagles have faced an uncomfortable situation regarding a key employee in recent times.

The NRL’s Manly Sea Eagles have faced an uncomfortable situation regarding a key employee in recent times. Just as the club’s pre-season was about to start, it had two head coaches ready, willing and able to show up for training. Trent Barrett had tendered his resignation from the position in June 2018 and was serving out his twelve-month notice period. In the meantime, the club had also hired Des Hasler to replace Barrett as the head coach.

Despite hiring a new coach, the club remained adamant that it would not pay Barrett in lieu of the notice period and would require him to attend for work, apparently in a different role. It had also been reported by various journalists that he was being required to attend work because the club either would not or could not afford to pay him a lump sum in lieu of the notice period.

The head coach double-up was ultimately avoided following an agreement that the club would pay Barrett his normal pay in monthly instalments on the proviso that he no longer attended the workplace. Essentially, Barrett has been placed on ‘garden leave’.

From a broader workplace relations perspective, this saga raises interesting questions about how employers can manage employees during their notice periods. There are a number of options available to employers which are briefly described below:

(1) Payment in lieu of notice

An employer may wish to pay an employee in lieu of them working the requisite notice period. This may be because it is easier to terminate the employment relationship and hire a replacement straight away, or because there is a risk that the departing employee will be disruptive, unproductive and/or misuse confidential information.

(2) Working out the notice period

Alternatively, an employer can require a departing employee to work out all or part of the notice period. This may be to allow the departing employee to finalise tasks or assist in training a replacement employee.

(3) Garden leave

Finally, an employer may be able to place an employee on ‘garden leave’. As with Barrett and the Sea Eagles, this involves paying an employee during their notice period (as they would normally be paid) but directing them to not attend the workplace and to not perform any duties – instead requiring them to, theoretically, spend that time at home.

The employee remains an employee and is still required to comply with any of the employer’s reasonable and lawful directions as may be required.

There are various reasons for an employer to place an employee on garden leave. For example, if it is known that the employee is leaving to join a competitor then the employer may wish to remove the employee from the workplace and minimise any risk of misuse of confidential information before they leave. Placing the employee on garden leave also means that the employee continues to owe their employer obligations as an employee such as acting in the best interests of the business and not performing work for any other employer.

In other cases, the employer may not wish for the employee to remain in the workplace but would like them to perform a handover. The employer can therefore require that an employee be on garden leave but that they must attend work only for the purposes of providing the handover.

The right to place an employee on garden leave generally arises from a contractual arrangement. Employers who consider garden leave to be an attractive option for managing an employee during their notice period should ensure that the termination provisions of the employee’s employment contract allow the employer to direct the employee to take garden leave during their notice period.

Of course, the downside of placing an employee on garden leave during their notice period is that they are effectively being paid their normal remuneration to do nothing. This could mean spending a significant amount of money for a lengthy period of time.


The Barrett/Sea Eagles situation is a good reminder for employers to ensure that, when drafting employment contracts at the commencement of the employment relationship, consideration is given to the practical effect of how any termination will actually play out – particularly ‘garden leave’ clauses and the reasonableness of notice periods.

Careful contract clause drafting will also minimise the risk of any uncomfortable situations at the end of the employment relationship.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.


Commission finds swearing in workplace constituted sexual harassment and warranted summary dismissal


With the new Respect@Work amendments now in place, employers should be mindful of a recent decision handed down by the Fair Work Commission where it upheld the dismissal of an employee on the basis that swearing at a colleague constituted sexual harassment.


Northern Territory Station Farm Manager validly dismissed for fighting with employee and using lewd language

Country and Western

In the first of a two-part blog series, we look at inappropriate conduct and behaviour in the workplace and the importance of dealing with problematic workplace behaviour.


Commission confirms inappropriate touching constituted sexual harassment warranting summary dismissal

‘Scuse you

Sexual harassment in the workplace has been the subject of significant reform over the past few years, with an even greater onus on employers now to take proactive measures to minimise or eliminate the risk of sexual harassment in connection with work.


Employers delay sinks bid for injunctive relief

Speak now

When seeking to enforce a restraint, it is important that employers seek to enforce the restraint in a timely manner to prevent future or an ongoing breach. Any delay will be considered by the courts when assessing whether it is reasonable to enforce the restraint.


Two-year post-employment restraint on hairdresser found to be unreasonable

Splitting hairs

When it comes to drafting post-employment restraints in employment contracts, it is important for employers to consider the purpose of the restraint and whether or not the restraint reasonably serves that purpose.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.