Resources: News Alerts

Managing Workplace Behaviour: "You Get What You Tolerate"

News Alerts
|

Key Takeaways from our Webinar

In our August webinar, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, discussed the challenges faced by modern employers when managing workplace behaviour. In that webinar, Athena examined a number of recent unfair dismissal decisions of the Fair Work Commission which provide some good guidance for employers.

In our August webinar, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, discussed the challenges faced by modern employers when managing workplace behaviour. In that webinar, Athena examined a number of recent unfair dismissal decisions of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) which provide some good guidance for employers.


For those who missed the webinar, below are three key takeaways:


1. Understand the difference between behaviour, performance and misconduct


It is crucial that managers and HR understand the differences between behaviour, performance and misconduct, and that they correctly identify the problem before taking any further action.


Poor behaviour can include a variety of things such as an employee being uncooperative or unprofessional, acting in a way that is passive aggressive or creates low-level tension in the workplace, or displaying poor email or online etiquette with customers or colleagues.


Poor performance is generally defined as a failure to achieve certain standards or output, usually measured against pre-existing goals or responsibilities that are relevant to an employee’s position, such as Key Performance Indicators (or KPIs) or an employee’s Position Description.


Misconduct most often concerns an act (or acts) committed by an employee that is unacceptable and calls for some corrective disciplinary action.


In Zirilli v StarTrack Express Pty Limited [2019] FWC 3557, an employer was found to have unfairly dismissed an employee because it incorrectly identified his poor performance as a matter of misconduct. The FWC found that the employee was denied an opportunity to improve his poor performance prior to his dismissal, and awarded the employee $17,504.79 in compensation.

2. Realise the importance of developing and implementing a Code of Conduct


Developing a Code of Conduct that sets out the employer’s values and culture will go far in minimising the risk of employee misbehaviour and enabling employers to take action where behaviour does not meet the standards required.


Employers should consider the standards of behaviour that they will expect from employees and set this out in a clear and unambiguous document, along with the possible consequences of non-compliance. A strong Code of Conduct, along with a leadership team that abides by and actively demonstrates its standards, will ensure that every individual employee knows what is expected of them, regardless of their position within the organisation.


A Code of Conduct should also serve to remind employees that they are representatives of the employer and their behaviour will be seen as a reflection of the employer, including when it comes to activity on social media.

 

3. Act swiftly and fairly when poor behaviour arises


Poor behaviour can have toxic consequences for an organisation if it is not dealt with in a prompt and fair manner. It can lead to more serious issues like bullying and workplace gossip, creating risks to the health and safety of other employees and the workplace generally.


In Meredith v Chad Group Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FWC 1467, the FWC found that the employer had tolerated the dismissed employee’s unacceptable behaviour for so long that it had resulted in a young employee fearing for their safety and ultimately resigning from their job. It had also exposed other employees to unnecessary and unacceptable abuse. The employer only dismissed the employee when he directed his unacceptable behaviour towards a director, and on that occasion, the dismissal was so devoid of procedural fairness that it made the dismissal unfair.


When an employer becomes aware of an employee behaving poorly, it should take appropriate steps to address and rectify the poor behaviour and remind all employees of the importance of upholding the employer’s standards of behaviour.


In many instances, a simple reminder to employees as a group will be effective. However, where an employee refuses to adjust their behaviour in the workplace, managers and HR staff should not hesitate to address these issues directly with the employee, including in the form of disciplinary action if necessary.

Similar articles

FWC upholds dismissal of employee for sending harassing messages and emails to his manager

Message not received

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks can often arise from hazards such as workplace conflict or poor workplace relationships.

Read more...

“Bad Blood”: Adverse Action and Unfair Dismissal

In the wake of challenging economic circumstances and increasing episodes of poor employee behaviour, employers may be required to make difficult, but necessary, decisions in relation to its workforce.

Read more...

Commission finds inappropriate social media use formed valid reason for dismissal

Message delivered

A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed that an employee’s inappropriate use of social media group chats may form a valid reason for dismissal, particularly when matters relating to work are discussed.

Read more...

ICYMI: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) August 2024 Changes

A number of amendments were made to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) which commenced on 26 August 2024. A brief summary of the changes are set out here for those who may have missed them.

Read more...

Model Delegates’ Rights Terms in Modern Awards

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 (Cth), required modern awards to include a term that provides for the exercise of the rights of workplace delegates. Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) introduced by the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 (Cth), required modern awards to include a term that provides for the exercise of the rights of workplace delegates.

Read more...

First Regulated Labour Hire Arrangement Order

The first tranche of amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) pursuant to the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Closing Loopholes) Act 2023 (Cth) provided new powers to the Fair Work Commission to make a “regulated labour hire arrangement order”.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.