Resources: Blog

Ethnic slurs in the workplace


That’s my pejorative

All employers should be aware that discrimination in the workplace on the basis of a “protected attribute” is unlawful. For example, Australia’s anti-discrimination legislation provides that it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of “race.”

All employers should be aware that discrimination in the workplace on the basis of a “protected attribute” is unlawful. For example, Australia’s anti-discrimination legislation provides that it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of “race.”

Significantly, however, the legislation extends beyond “race”: the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RD Act) for example, also provides that it is unlawful to discriminate on the basis of colour, descent, national or ethnic origin. In NSW, the Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) provides that it is unlawful to discriminate on the ground of race, and defines race to include colour, nationality, descent and ethnic, ethno-religious or national origin.

Australia is a diverse country and its workforce comprises of people from different backgrounds. The use of certain words – which may not be considered particularly discriminatory or derogatory in Australia – may be offensive for persons from different cultural or ethnic backgrounds. Accordingly, employers and employees should be aware that using language that may refer to a person’s ethnicity and which may not overtly refer to a person’s race will still be caught by the RD Act.

During the A-League game between Melbourne Victory and Melbourne City this month, Melbourne City’s goalkeeper was caught on camera calling a Melbourne Victory player, who is of Albanian nationality, a “f***king gypsy”. While the goalkeeper admitted that he made the remarks, he also sought to explain that he did not know that the term was offensive and swiftly issued an apology.

Football Federation Australia (FFA) was also as swift in its punishment and has banned the Melbourne City goalkeeper for five games after it found that the player used discriminatory, including racist, religious, ethnic or sexist language toward the Melbourne Victory player.

Not only was the conduct against the spirit of the game, it was also racially discriminatory, particularly when you consider that the players were at their ‘workplace’ namely on the football field when it occurred.

What should employers do?

  • Adopt an anti-discrimination policy which provides that all forms of discrimination (including on the basis of race, colour, descent, national or ethnic origin) is not tolerated in the workplace.
  • Carry out regular training sessions for all employees to reinforce that discriminatory language and behaviour in the workplace should not be used. Cultural intelligence training may also be beneficial to raise awareness of cultural diversity.
  • Act immediately to address and correct any behaviour which may be considered discriminatory.

What does this mean for sporting organisations?

  • Sporting organisations must also comply with Australia’s anti-discrimination legislation – for athletes and sporting professionals, the workplace includes the sporting field.
  • Train team members in appropriate on-field behaviour and what amounts to discriminatory conduct.
  • Address any behaviour which may be considered discriminatory, for example, if it is not appropriate for an office environment then it is not appropriate for the sporting field or locker room.

Similar articles

“All reasonable steps” and vicarious liability

You're a liability

Federal and State anti-discrimination legislation makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate against or harass a person in their employment. The legislation also places liability on employers for the discriminatory conduct of their employees.


Employee dismissed for offensive remarks in the workplace

What did you say?

It goes without saying that employees should treat each other with respect and courtesy in the workplace. In a recent decision, the FWC was tasked with considering a claim from a dismissed employee who alleged that remarks he made in the workplace were not offensive and did not justify his dismissal.


Why clubs need to regulate fan and member behaviour at sporting events

Have a seat and take a stand

Racial abuse from fans and/or members certainly falls foul of discrimination laws and can lead to significant questions being asked of clubs and organisations about what steps they took or could have reasonably taken to prevent players from being subject to such behaviour.


Salary reduction brought employee under high income threshold

Below not above

The COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic has significantly impacted the financial stability of many businesses. Employers have had to make difficult decisions and implement different measures to ensure the ongoing viability of their businesses. Some of these measures have included asking employees to agree to temporary reductions in their hours of work or to a reduction in their remuneration.


Company vicariously liable for injury resulting from skylarking supervisor

All in good fun

Enjoying the company of your colleagues is something most people hope to find in the workplace. It can make work much more enjoyable and lead to lasting friendships. However, fun in the workplace can cross a line when it takes the form of dangerous skylarking or roughhousing.


Managing employee conduct and behaviour in the workplace

Draw the line

Managing employee conduct and behaviour can be a challenge. The question of what is appropriate and what is not appropriate in the workplace will depend on a variety of factors, including the industry in which the employees work, the overall culture of the workplace and community standards at any given time.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.