Resources: Blog

Why employers should encourage a strong work health and safety culture


Safety first

By taking a “safety first” approach, workers are educated in WHS matters, how to report WHS issues, concerns or near misses and are assured that such matters will be taken seriously.

Work health and safety (WHS) legislation aims to ensure the health and safety of workers at work. Essentially, the legislation places obligations on employers and workers to ensure that workers who attend work will return home with their lives, limbs and mental faculties intact.

As a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) under the model Work Health Safety Act (model Act), employers have the primary duty of care to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers at work. Similarly, workers also have duties at work to take reasonable care for their own health and safety and that of others in the workplace.

These duties are supported by the obligations on a PCBU to consult with workers on WHS matters. The model Act provides that consultation requires that:

  • workers are given information about a WHS matter;
  • workers have the opportunity to give their views and to raise WHS issues in relation to the WHS matter and to contribute to the decision-making process;
  • workers’ views are considered; and

workers are advised of the outcome of the consultation in a timely manner. The obligation to consult with workers is an essential part of minimising and eliminating risks to health and safety. The Safe Work Australia Work Health and Safety Consultation, Cooperation and Coordination Code of Practice identifies that WHS consultation creates greater awareness and commitment to health and safety and also leads to positive working relationships.

Employers should foster a consultative workplace with clear processes to allow workers to report WHS matters when they arise. In addition to ensuring compliance with the model Act, this will lead to a strong safety culture where workers have confidence in the responsiveness of their employer to address WHS matters without the fear of reprisal, rather than having to seek recourse with state and territory WHS regulators. Whilst WHS regulators recently encouraged employees to report WHS hazards or incidents, it is preferable for employers to address WHS matters internally.

There is always the risk that complaints made to the regulator will result in a WHS inspector coming to the workplace and could potentially lead to further investigations or enforcement measures. For example, inspection notices or improvement notices which may arise from a visit by the WHS inspector could subsequently appear in litigation to support claims that the employer did not comply with their WHS duties.

Lessons for employers

By taking a “safety first” approach, workers are educated in WHS matters, how to report WHS issues, concerns or near misses and are assured that such matters will be taken seriously.


Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Commission finds mask mandate to be a lawful and reasonable direction

Mask up

Employees have a duty to comply with lawful and reasonable directions from their employer. In the current COVID-19 context, a key concern for employers is whether it is lawful and reasonable to issue directions related to safety matters arising from the pandemic.


Lack of consultation rendered mandatory vaccination requirement unreasonable

Talk before you walk

Consultation with employees always plays an important part when introducing changes in the workplace. Under work health and safety legislation, employers have a duty to consult with their workers as far as reasonably practicable in relation to health and safety matters.


The importance of WHS refresher training

Not a “one and done” thing

It is an expected and necessary part of work health and safety (WHS) plans that all new workers receive relevant WHS training.


Commission applies test confirmed by High Court in distinguishing between employee and contractor

Sham slam

In a recent decision, the Fair Work Commission has applied the test recently confirmed by the High Court of Australia in CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2, in distinguishing between employees and contractors.


Full Bench looks at meaning of dismissed for the purposes of the unfair dismissal jurisdiction

Down but not out

The question of whether a demotion will constitute a dismissal under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was considered by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission NSW Trains v James [2022] FWCFB 55.


Employer fails to disprove adverse action claim

Step back

A recent decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has reaffirmed the standard of proof that is required to disprove allegations of unlawful adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.