Resources: Blog

Why employers should encourage a strong work health and safety culture


Safety first

By taking a “safety first” approach, workers are educated in WHS matters, how to report WHS issues, concerns or near misses and are assured that such matters will be taken seriously.

Work health and safety (WHS) legislation aims to ensure the health and safety of workers at work. Essentially, the legislation places obligations on employers and workers to ensure that workers who attend work will return home with their lives, limbs and mental faculties intact.

As a person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) under the model Work Health Safety Act (model Act), employers have the primary duty of care to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health and safety of workers at work. Similarly, workers also have duties at work to take reasonable care for their own health and safety and that of others in the workplace.

These duties are supported by the obligations on a PCBU to consult with workers on WHS matters. The model Act provides that consultation requires that:

  • workers are given information about a WHS matter;
  • workers have the opportunity to give their views and to raise WHS issues in relation to the WHS matter and to contribute to the decision-making process;
  • workers’ views are considered; and

workers are advised of the outcome of the consultation in a timely manner. The obligation to consult with workers is an essential part of minimising and eliminating risks to health and safety. The Safe Work Australia Work Health and Safety Consultation, Cooperation and Coordination Code of Practice identifies that WHS consultation creates greater awareness and commitment to health and safety and also leads to positive working relationships.

Employers should foster a consultative workplace with clear processes to allow workers to report WHS matters when they arise. In addition to ensuring compliance with the model Act, this will lead to a strong safety culture where workers have confidence in the responsiveness of their employer to address WHS matters without the fear of reprisal, rather than having to seek recourse with state and territory WHS regulators. Whilst WHS regulators recently encouraged employees to report WHS hazards or incidents, it is preferable for employers to address WHS matters internally.

There is always the risk that complaints made to the regulator will result in a WHS inspector coming to the workplace and could potentially lead to further investigations or enforcement measures. For example, inspection notices or improvement notices which may arise from a visit by the WHS inspector could subsequently appear in litigation to support claims that the employer did not comply with their WHS duties.

Lessons for employers

By taking a “safety first” approach, workers are educated in WHS matters, how to report WHS issues, concerns or near misses and are assured that such matters will be taken seriously.


Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Company vicariously liable for injury resulting from skylarking supervisor

All in good fun

Enjoying the company of your colleagues is something most people hope to find in the workplace. It can make work much more enjoyable and lead to lasting friendships. However, fun in the workplace can cross a line when it takes the form of dangerous skylarking or roughhousing.


FWC upholds safety-related dismissal of employee given multiple chances

Patience, you must have

The Fair Work Commission’s recent decision in Hafsteins v Correct Installs Pty Ltd [2020] FWC 2729 has showcased a “patient” employer’s handling of an employee’s numerous workplace health and safety breaches.


Brisbane company first to be convicted of industrial manslaughter

Brisbane company first to be convicted of industrial manslaughter

Workplace fatalities are tragic and devastating events. In order to reflect the seriousness of these incidents, some jurisdictions across Australia have amended their work health and safety laws to establish the offence of industrial manslaughter, where the negligent conduct by a person conducting a business or undertaking or officers causes the death of a worker.


FWC upholds objection to constructive dismissal claim

Construction zone

In order to access the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, an employee must be “dismissed” from their employment by the employer. One of the instances in which an employee may be “dismissed” from their employment is if they were forced to resign because of the employer’s conduct or course of conduct.


Court penalises accountant for involvement in employer’s failure to keep employee records

Put your records on

The Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) impose a number of obligations on employers with respect to the making and keeping of employee records and pay slips.


The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.