Resources: Blog

Commission orders parties to stop yelling in the workplace

Blog
|

Quiet, please

The Fair Work Commission recently issued interim orders in an application for orders to stop bullying, which required the parties to, amongst other things, treat each other with respect and dignity, and to not yell in an unreasonable manner.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) recently issued interim orders in an application for orders to stop bullying, which required the parties to, amongst other things, treat each other with respect and dignity, and to not yell in an unreasonable manner (see F.G. [2019] FWC 6283).

The stop-bullying application had been lodged by an employee of a retail services business who alleged that he was being bullied by a co-director and owner of the business. The application was made against a background in which the business was also involved in other litigation relating to the director’s separation from the business as an owner, and the director had also made allegations that she was being bullied by the employer.

In the stop-bullying application, the director had failed to participate in two scheduled conferences with the FWC on the basis that she was medically unfit to have any contact with her employer.

In the meantime, the applicant sought interim orders alleging that, despite the director’s medical certificates, she continued to attend the workplace as the owner, and she unreasonably engaged with the applicant about the stop-bullying application.

Without making any findings about the applicant’s allegations, the FWC considered that, on face value, the applicant had a strong case, and that the “balance of convenience” weighed in favour of making the interim orders.

The “balance of convenience” test required the FWC to consider whether the benefit to be granted by the interim orders outweighed the inconvenience likely to be suffered by any of the parties. In this regard, the FWC considered that:

  • there was a prospect that the director might make contact with the applicant in the workplace;
  • the substantive application was not going to be dealt with or resolved in the immediate future noting
  • the director’s medical condition and the ongoing litigation;
  • the director also claimed she had been bullied by the employer; and
  • the safety and health of all the parties was at risk.

Accordingly, the FWC granted interim orders to the following effect:

  • the parties were to treat each other with respect and dignity and were not to yell, belittle or otherwise conduct themselves in an unreasonable manner when communicating to each other about the business;
  • the parties were not to contact each other about work-related matters when outside of the workplace;
  • the parties were not to discuss the merit or otherwise of the stop-bullying application; and
  • the employer was to implement reasonable measures to ensure that the parties were aware of their obligations.

Lessons for employers

These orders address matters that are normally dealt with in a Code of Conduct and other workplace behaviour policies and, on one view, are matters that should be common sense to employees.

Nonetheless, this decision demonstrates the wide ambit of the FWC’s power to make orders (whether interim or final) in stop-bullying applications, including orders directed to the conduct of the parties or that intervene in the management of a workplace.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Changes to the Fair Work Act and Sex Discrimination Act to commence shortly

NEWS UPDATE

On 2 September 2021, the Federal Parliament passed the Sex Discrimination and Fair Work (Respect at Work) Amendment Bill 2021 (the Bill).

Read more...

Commission finds on-the-job feedback sufficient in warning employee about poor performance

Hit the brakes

In the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) is required to consider a number of factors under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) when considering whether a dismissal was ‘harsh, unjust or unreasonable’.

Read more...

Fair Work Commission finds out-of-hours drink driving offence was not a valid reason for dismissal

Off the clock

Generally, the way in which an employee conducts themselves out-of-hours does not fall within the realm of what the employer can supervise or control. However, there are times where an employee’s conduct after business hours and away from work can impact the employment relationship.

Read more...

Commission orders employer to pay compensation as a result of its procedurally unfair disciplinary process

Procedurally disastrous

When investigating allegations of misconduct against an employee in the workplace, employers must ensure that any ensuing disciplinary process is kept distinct from and separate to from the investigation.

Read more...

The importance of WHS refresher training

Not a “one and done” thing

It is an expected and necessary part of work health and safety (WHS) plans that all new workers receive relevant WHS training.

Read more...

Casual Terms Award Review 2021

NEWS UPDATE

In March 2021, the casual employment amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced a new statutory definition of “casual employee” and an entitlement to casual conversion as one of the National Employment Standards (NES).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.