Resources: Blog

Anglo Saxon applicants preferred in online job advertisement


Need not apply

Job advertisements should be carefully drafted to ensure that they focus on the essential skills of the position and not any irrelevant or subjective factors.

Recently, a job advertisement from a Sydney Optus store was the subject of media attention for its discriminatory language. The job advertisement placed on Seek for a casual retail consultant at its Neutral Bay store stated that candidates who were “Anglo Saxon” and lived near Neutral Bay were preferred.

The advertisement prompted the question – had this Optus store engaged in discriminatory conduct that is considered unlawful under Australia’s anti-discrimination laws?

State and Federal anti-discrimination laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of a particular attribute. These attributes include race, sex, sexual preference, age, physical or mental disability, marital status or family or carer’s responsibilities. These anti-discrimination laws also prohibit unlawful discrimination in employment against a person on the basis of a protected attribute.

For example, section 15 of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RD Act) provides that employers cannot:

  • Refuse or fail to employ a person for work which is available and for which the person is qualified;
  • Refuse or fail to offer or afford the same terms and conditions of employment or opportunities for training and promotion; or
  • Dismiss an employee from their employment,

due to that person’s race, colour, or national or ethnic origin.

This also extends to recruitment including job advertisements, where it is unlawful to publish a discriminatory advertisement which treats job seekers less favourably on the basis of a protected attribute. In this case, non-Anglo-Saxon candidates were to be treated less favourably, in that they were not “preferred”.

After being alerted to the advertisement, Optus promptly took it down, stating that it was in breach of Optus’ own standards and commitment to equal opportunity. Optus has since conducted an investigation into the incident and has taken disciplinary action against the persons involved.

Lessons for employers

Employers should be mindful of discrimination in the recruitment process and have an open and equal opportunity recruitment strategy. Job advertisements should be carefully drafted to ensure that they focus on the essential skills of the position and not any irrelevant or subjective factors. By doing so, employers will eliminate discrimination in the recruitment process, get the best person for the position and minimise reputational risks to the business.


Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.


Similar articles

“All reasonable steps” and vicarious liability

You're a liability

Federal and State anti-discrimination legislation makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate against or harass a person in their employment. The legislation also places liability on employers for the discriminatory conduct of their employees.


Employee dismissed for offensive remarks in the workplace

What did you say?

It goes without saying that employees should treat each other with respect and courtesy in the workplace. In a recent decision, the FWC was tasked with considering a claim from a dismissed employee who alleged that remarks he made in the workplace were not offensive and did not justify his dismissal.


How a region banded together to improve employment standards

Group Effort

No employer operates in a silo – all employers operate in complex systems of interrelated stakeholders including employees, customers, other businesses, and regulators who enforce the laws that apply to the employer and their business.


The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.


Notice of termination in the employment contract

Put it in writing

When it comes to engaging new employees or promoting existing employees, it is crucial that employers prepare and review contracts of employment to ensure that they accurately reflect the terms which will govern an employee’s employment.


Termination of employment letters

In your letter

A termination of employment letter serves a significant purpose in bringing the employment relationship to an end.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.