Resources: Blog

Part 2: Age discrimination and technology in the workplace

Blog
|

Just Google it

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

Unsurprisingly, many employers (either consciously or unconsciously) shift their focus to investing in the training and development of younger employees, assuming that they are more receptive to technological changes.

This mindset has the potential to expose employers to discrimination claims by those employees who feel that they are either not given the same opportunities as younger employees or, in some cases, unreasonably directed by their employer to do something that they are not able to do by virtue of their age. A recent study by the Benevolent Society found that over half of the people surveyed who were over 65 years old had experienced some form of age discrimination in their employment, whether it be in the form of a joke, being patronised or simply being ignored.

Consider, by way of analogy, a 75 year old gentleman in Adelaide who made news headlines recently after his grandchildren gifted him an iPhone for his birthday. In an effort to embrace the new technology but with no idea how to use it, the gentleman approached his local Telstra store for instructions. The rather abrupt response from the staff at Telstra was that he should “just Google it”. Later that day, an Aldi employee, upon hearing this gentleman’s struggle whilst at the checkout, offered to give him some quick and helpful assistance.

If this gentleman were an employee who was directed to use a new piece of technology by his employer and, every time he sought assistance from management, was ignored or told to “just Google it”, the risks of that employee becoming disengaged and feeling indirectly discriminated against because of his age are increased.

It goes both ways

Whilst employers should take all reasonable steps to ensure that employees are provided with an opportunity to learn and understand a new process, it can be equally said that an employee must be willing to learn and adapt to these changes. Businesses will inevitably undergo technological upgrades and will introduce new systems and machinery to improve efficiency. It is also inevitable that employees will have to undergo training and development when these changes occur – any resistance to this aspect of a job leaves an employee at risk of becoming superfluous to the operation of the business.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Employee dismissed for exercising workplace right to take leave

Diamonds are not a girl’s best friend

The general protections provisions under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) provide protections against adverse action which is taken for a prohibited reason. Prohibited reasons for taking adverse action include situations where a person has a workplace right and exercises (or proposes to exercise) that right. Workplace rights include the right to utilise leave entitlements under the FW Act.

Read more...

Court finds multiple breaches of general protections provisions

Direction needed

The Federal Circuit Court of Australia (the Court) recently ruled on an application brought by an employee alleging that three respondents had engaged in breaches of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), including sham contracting and dismissing the employee because she was pregnant.

Read more...

Court finds rescinded job offer was not age discrimination

The rooster and the sunrise

Discrimination in the workplace is unlawful under a number of Australian laws, including state and federal anti-discrimination legislation (such as the Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth)) as well as the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

Read more...

Commission orders employer to pay compensation as a result of its procedurally unfair disciplinary process

Procedurally disastrous

When investigating allegations of misconduct against an employee in the workplace, employers must ensure that any ensuing disciplinary process is kept distinct from and separate to from the investigation.

Read more...

The importance of WHS refresher training

Not a “one and done” thing

It is an expected and necessary part of work health and safety (WHS) plans that all new workers receive relevant WHS training.

Read more...

Casual Terms Award Review 2021

NEWS UPDATE

In March 2021, the casual employment amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced a new statutory definition of “casual employee” and an entitlement to casual conversion as one of the National Employment Standards (NES).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.