Resources: Blog

Part 2: Age discrimination and technology in the workplace

Blog
|

Just Google it

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

In the modern day workplace, employers are becoming increasingly reliant on computer systems and introducing new forms of technology and equipment to increase productivity and output. It is often therefore a requirement that employees be proficient in certain computer programs or, at least, that they undergo training to become proficient.

Unsurprisingly, many employers (either consciously or unconsciously) shift their focus to investing in the training and development of younger employees, assuming that they are more receptive to technological changes.

This mindset has the potential to expose employers to discrimination claims by those employees who feel that they are either not given the same opportunities as younger employees or, in some cases, unreasonably directed by their employer to do something that they are not able to do by virtue of their age. A recent study by the Benevolent Society found that over half of the people surveyed who were over 65 years old had experienced some form of age discrimination in their employment, whether it be in the form of a joke, being patronised or simply being ignored.

Consider, by way of analogy, a 75 year old gentleman in Adelaide who made news headlines recently after his grandchildren gifted him an iPhone for his birthday. In an effort to embrace the new technology but with no idea how to use it, the gentleman approached his local Telstra store for instructions. The rather abrupt response from the staff at Telstra was that he should “just Google it”. Later that day, an Aldi employee, upon hearing this gentleman’s struggle whilst at the checkout, offered to give him some quick and helpful assistance.

If this gentleman were an employee who was directed to use a new piece of technology by his employer and, every time he sought assistance from management, was ignored or told to “just Google it”, the risks of that employee becoming disengaged and feeling indirectly discriminated against because of his age are increased.

It goes both ways

Whilst employers should take all reasonable steps to ensure that employees are provided with an opportunity to learn and understand a new process, it can be equally said that an employee must be willing to learn and adapt to these changes. Businesses will inevitably undergo technological upgrades and will introduce new systems and machinery to improve efficiency. It is also inevitable that employees will have to undergo training and development when these changes occur – any resistance to this aspect of a job leaves an employee at risk of becoming superfluous to the operation of the business.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

“All reasonable steps” and vicarious liability

You're a liability

Federal and State anti-discrimination legislation makes it unlawful for employers to discriminate against or harass a person in their employment. The legislation also places liability on employers for the discriminatory conduct of their employees.

Read more...

FWC finds evolving technology not a significant role change for IT employee

Head in the cloud

Organisational change is a constant for business – whether it involves wider cultural change within a company, the introduction of new technology or systems of work, or even a restructure or downsizing of the workforce.

Read more...

Employee dismissed for offensive remarks in the workplace

What did you say?

It goes without saying that employees should treat each other with respect and courtesy in the workplace. In a recent decision, the FWC was tasked with considering a claim from a dismissed employee who alleged that remarks he made in the workplace were not offensive and did not justify his dismissal.

Read more...

The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.

Read more...

Notice of termination in the employment contract

Put it in writing

When it comes to engaging new employees or promoting existing employees, it is crucial that employers prepare and review contracts of employment to ensure that they accurately reflect the terms which will govern an employee’s employment.

Read more...

Termination of employment letters

In your letter

A termination of employment letter serves a significant purpose in bringing the employment relationship to an end.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.