Resources: Blog

What can we say in our appearance policies and dress codes about beards?

Blog
|

Close shave

The rate of men growing their beards is increasing all thanks to the current hipster trend. Beards may be non-controversial in some working environment and not permitted in others. When confronted with a growing trend towards facial hair, employers requiring a clean shaven look may be challenged as to the reasonableness (or otherwise) of their appearance requirements for employees.

The rate of men growing their beards is increasing all thanks to the current hipster trend. Beards may be non-controversial in some working environment and not permitted in others. When confronted with a growing trend towards facial hair, employers requiring a clean shaven look may be challenged as to the reasonableness (or otherwise) of their appearance requirements for employees.

Employers should consider whether they are prepared to make allowances for facial hair in their appearance policies. Factors to consider would include branding and image, hygiene requirements and safety issues.

On 14 May 2015, a matter involving a ban on beards by the Victorian Police was dealt with by the Victorian Supreme Court. The Court upheld VCAT’s earlier finding that the ban on beards was not discriminatory. The ban was introduced by the Police in 2012, with officers allowed to have neat moustaches but no beards and no other facial hair. The officers claimed the ban made them less attractive and that there were religious reasons for their facial hair. These arguments failed in VCAT at first instance and VCAT’s decision was upheld by the Supreme Court. In Martin Cochrane v Ambrose Haulage Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 838 Mr Cochrane’s employment was terminated, with one of the reasons for the termination being that he came to work with a half shaved beard which showed a disregard for his employer. Commissioner Simpson observed that Mr Cochrane had not been clearly directed by his manager not to wear his facial hair in that “style”. Whilst Mr Cochrane was aware that his employer did not like it, as he had not been specifically directed not to do it – there was no valid reason for termination and Mr Cochrane was unfairly dismissed.

In James Felton v BHP Billiton Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 1838, Mr Felton’s employment was terminated because he repeatedly refused to follow a direction to present to work clean-shaven in order to allow a respirator fit test to be completed. This direction was given in the context of a clean shaven policy. In this case, Commissioner Hampton found it was reasonable for BHP Billiton to direct employees at an underground mine to be clean shaven to ensure their respirators protected them from workplace hazards.

After considering the relevant factors to the workplace, employers should set their standards for facial hair clearly and enforce them fairly. The issue of grooming, particularly around facial hair is prickly and regardless of the policy or standard, employers should always be willing to talk to employees about their policies, especially where there may be religious or medical reasons for the beard.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Fair Work Commission finds out-of-hours drink driving offence was not a valid reason for dismissal

Off the clock

Generally, the way in which an employee conducts themselves out-of-hours does not fall within the realm of what the employer can supervise or control. However, there are times where an employee’s conduct after business hours and away from work can impact the employment relationship.

Read more...

Vaccinations and the workplace

Shots fired

One of the most topical questions for employers during the COVID-19 pandemic has been whether they need to introduce policies that mandate vaccinations and, if so, what can be done to enforce them in the workplace.

Read more...

SafeWork NSW successfully prosecutes a PCBU for failing its consultation obligations with other duty holders

Consult, co-operate and co-ordinate

Persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs) have a range of positive duties and obligations to ensure the health and safety of workers under the model work health and safety laws in Australia.

Read more...

Commission orders employer to pay compensation as a result of its procedurally unfair disciplinary process

Procedurally disastrous

When investigating allegations of misconduct against an employee in the workplace, employers must ensure that any ensuing disciplinary process is kept distinct from and separate to from the investigation.

Read more...

The importance of WHS refresher training

Not a “one and done” thing

It is an expected and necessary part of work health and safety (WHS) plans that all new workers receive relevant WHS training.

Read more...

Casual Terms Award Review 2021

NEWS UPDATE

In March 2021, the casual employment amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced a new statutory definition of “casual employee” and an entitlement to casual conversion as one of the National Employment Standards (NES).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.