Resources: Blogs

In the box to the left

Blogs
|

The return of employer uniforms on termination of employment

Ending the employment relationship can sometimes be difficult and often, those responsible for facilitating the termination are so relieved to have it all over that they don’t worry about pursuing the return of seemingly insignificant employer property, like used uniform items.

Ending the employment relationship can sometimes be difficult and often, those responsible for facilitating the termination are so relieved to have it all over that they don’t worry about pursuing the return of seemingly insignificant employer property, like used uniform items.

The return of uniform items at the end of employment, particularly those with company branding, can seem like quibbling over something small. However, the purpose of pursuing the return of such property is not necessarily to recycle clothes for a new employee, but to protect the employer’s brand and reputation.

Consider, for example, a situation where a former employee (or some unrelated third party in possession of the uniform) appears in an image or video online committing acts or promoting views that are inconsistent with the employer’s values. This type of negative publicity can be particularly damaging and is, for the most part, easily avoidable.

 

How can employers ensure that employee uniforms are returned at the end of the employment relationship?

  • Maintain control over uniforms by keeping uniforms on the premises – for example, an employer may allocate uniform items to employees to wear during their shifts, provide appropriate change room facilities for employees to change into their uniform and provide a laundering service to ensure that uniforms are cleaned for employees. This type of arrangement will ensure that uniforms do not leave the employer’s premises. Employees should have no need to wear the uniforms outside of the workplace or remove them from the premises.
  • Include a “return of employer property” clause in all employment contracts, including specific reference to the return of uniforms – not only does this approach set up an early expectation (at the commencement of employment) but it also gives the employer a contractual right to rely on when demanding the return of uniform items at a later date.
  • Include the return of uniforms in a termination checklist – remembering which loose ends to tie up at the conclusion of the employment relationship can be challenging. Having a checklist to remind employers of what needs to be done can be helpful in this regard. Including the return of uniform items on this checklist will help to remind managers that returning any uniform items is an essential part of the termination process.
  • Make a formal written request for the return of uniforms – if an employer forgets to ask an employee to return their uniform at the time of termination, they can follow up with a written request after employment has ended. This might take the form of an email or a letter to the employee’s last known address.
  • Seek assistance from a legal advisor and/or the courts – where all direct attempts by an employer fail, they may consider consulting with their legal advisor about how the matter can be escalated. This may involve seeking orders from a court for the return of property or an injunction restraining the former employee from wearing the uniform items. Usually, this type of relief is only available in serious circumstances and can be a costly process.

In summary, employers should not forget that uniform items supplied to employees are the employer’s property and should be returned on termination of employment. The consequences for failing to seek the return of uniform items can be serious and can include damage to brand and reputation.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.

Read more...

Commission finds swearing in workplace constituted sexual harassment and warranted summary dismissal

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

With the new Respect@Work amendments now in place, employers should be mindful of a recent decision handed down by the Fair Work Commission where it upheld the dismissal of an employee on the basis that swearing at a colleague constituted sexual harassment.

Read more...

Northern Territory Station Farm Manager validly dismissed for fighting with employee and using lewd language

Country and Western

In the first of a two-part blog series, we look at inappropriate conduct and behaviour in the workplace and the importance of dealing with problematic workplace behaviour.

Read more...

Contractor and customer ordered to pay compensation and pecuniary penalties to harassed employee

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was amended in 2023 to prohibit sexual harassment in Australian workplaces. the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia recently made declarations that a contractor and a customer had breached the FW Act by sexually harassing an employee.

Read more...

Employer’s inaction in responding to proven sexual misconduct left employee with no choice but to resign

Forced over-Board

A resignation that is “forced” due to the employer’s conduct may be considered a “dismissal” within the meaning of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), thereby granting the employee access to the unfair dismissal or general protections jurisdictions.

Read more...

Control in the independent contractor relations

Ctrl key

In determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor, courts and tribunals are required to assess the “real substance, practical reality and true nature” of the relationship, per s 15AA of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required