Resources: Blogs

I smell a rat

Blogs
|

The new FWO anonymous tip-off service

The Fair Work Ombudsman has announced a new anonymous tip-off service aimed at encouraging the general public to report businesses that they suspect are doing the wrong thing by employees.

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has announced a new anonymous tip-off service aimed at encouraging the general public to report businesses that they suspect are doing the wrong thing by employees.

The service is intended to provide a comfortable way for employees to report workplace issues without opening themselves up to repercussions from their employers. It also provides other parties with the opportunity to report non-compliant businesses in circumstances where they don’t wish to be identified or don’t want to get directly involved.

The FWO has highlighted the information gathering function of the service, saying that it will use anonymous reports to identify trends and patterns in an effort to zone in on compliance areas to “follow up”.

However, the full scope of the service is yet to be fully understood and the FWO has flagged that it expects the service to evolve over time.

FWO Natalie James has said the agency will not “be storming into a business on the basis of one anonymous tip off”, but what remains unclear is whether multiple tip-offs will result in any kind of FWO action. Each report must clearly identify the business it relates to, yet the FWO has said that it will not treat anonymous reports like requests for assistance or provide any response to tippers. Furthermore, the FWO website says that anonymous reports will be used to plan current and future education and enforcement activities. So whilst gathering information is clearly one of the service’s main functions, whether reports will result in an FWO inquiry is less clear.

One concern is the likelihood of anonymous reports being made based on misunderstandings. The workplace relations system in Australia is complex and it’s easy for employees or third parties to misunderstand their entitlements or to misinterpret a situation. How will the FWO deal with mistaken complaints or worse, ‘witch hunts’ by disgruntled employees (or groups of them)?

Ultimately, the service shouldn’t be necessary if employers are doing the right thing and as Ms James has pointed out, most businesses are trying to do the right thing. In light of this, we would hope that the tip-off service should be used for nothing other than information gathering to help develop compliance and education programs.

We will be watching this space as the service evolves.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Casual swearing no excuse for conduct

A little less conversational swearing

There is no doubt that swearing in the workplace is unacceptable - the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has repeatedly held that swearing in an abusive manner that is directed towards others is a valid reason for dismissal.

Read more...

Workplace bullying and reasonable management action

Just Managing

Workplace bullying can be extremely serious and should not be tolerated by employers.

Read more...

Dentist penalised for non-compliance and personally ordered to rectify underpayments

Brace yourself for consequences

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) is responsible for ensuring compliance with workplace laws.

Read more...

High Court rules on scope of inquiry of redeployment within an employers enterprise

That’s not how this works

In “Where does it end?” we looked at the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2024] FCAFC 45. In that decision, the Full Federal Court refused an application from an employer seeking orders to quash previous decisions and compel the Fair Work Commission from further dealing with unfair dismissal applications lodged by employees who had been made redundant.

Read more...

Mad Mex franchisee to pay $305,000 in damages for sexual harassment claim

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) protects employees from sexual harassment, and as part of the Respect@Work amendments now prohibits sex-based harassment.

Read more...

FWC rejects constructive dismissal claim, finding the employment ended by “mutual agreement”

Mutually beneficial

For an employee to have access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that the employee was “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required