Resources: Blog

The danger to employers for employees caught behaving badly


Video on demand

The recent Australia Day off-field incident which involved an NRL Sydney Roosters player serves a warning to both employers and employees about the dangers of alcohol and social media.

The recent Australia Day off-field incident which involved an NRL Sydney Roosters (the Club) player serves a warning to both employers and employees about the dangers of alcohol and social media.

The player was filmed on camera stimulating a lewd act with a dog at a private party.

The player and some other team mates attended the party after the Club’s sanctioned Sydney Harbour cruise which took place earlier in the day had ended.

As a result of his actions, the player was fined $75,000 ($125,000 fine with $50,000 suspended) and suspended for eight weeks following an agreement between the Club and the NRL.

In this circumstance, the NRL and the Club were required to intervene and sanction the player for a variety of reasons including:

  • The nature of his conduct;
  • The reputational damage to the NRL and the Club – the same player had been involved in a previous off-field incident in 2014; and
  • The pressure from third parties and fans – there was certainly plenty of media commentary on how and why the player should be banned from the NRL for life and that the incident would bring about the end of his career.

This incident also highlights the potential issues and / or adverse implications for employers when an employee’s inappropriate or unacceptable conduct is captured and then publicised – for example, damage to the employer’s brand (business reputation) and/or loss of customers/clients.

The candid video of the player was filmed by another partygoer without his consent and then sold to a media agency who on sold it to Channel Nine, News Corp and Fairfax. The Club sought legal advice about whether to pursue legal action against those responsible for filming and then selling the video.

Looking at this in the broader workplace context, unfortunately, the incident raises an additional consideration for employers when planning the next office work party or function – what to do about smart phones.


Should employers go as far as banning smart phone devices from the parties?

Smart phones provide ample opportunity for an employee’s embarrassing or objectionable conduct at the office party or even when the party “kicks on” to another gathering to be recorded and then shared throughout the workplace and/or via social media – often without the consent of the employee. Employers should consider cautioning all employees about the use of smart phones during work events - obviously if everyone behaves then there will be no problem and no need to consider restricting the use of smart phones or the taking of photographs at such events.


Lessons to learn

In addition to carefully planning the next event – in terms of food, drink & location – employers must ensure employees are told what is expected in terms of their behaviour and what could happen if employees fail to meet those expectations. An employer’s code of conduct should contemplate circumstances where an employee’s actions bring the organisation into disrepute – allowing the employer to step in when situations such as this one arise.


Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.


Similar articles

FWC highlights the importance of a social media policy to safeguard employers’ reputations

An unwanted footprint

Employees have a duty to ensure that their out of hours conduct (including social media posts) is not contrary to the obligations they owe to their employer. Further employees should also ensure that out of hours conduct is not in breach of workplace policies or damaging to the reputation of their employer.


Fair Work Commission finds out-of-hours drink driving offence was not a valid reason for dismissal

Off the clock

Generally, the way in which an employee conducts themselves out-of-hours does not fall within the realm of what the employer can supervise or control. However, there are times where an employee’s conduct after business hours and away from work can impact the employment relationship.


Fair Work Commission upholds dismissal of an employee who misused a company coffee account

Caffeine Hit

Financial misconduct committed by an employee can fundamentally damage the trust and confidence in an employment relationship. Unfortunately, financial misconduct is a common issue for Australian businesses and if it is not dealt with promptly and effectively, there is an opportunity for further misadventure.


Commission applies test confirmed by High Court in distinguishing between employee and contractor

Sham slam

In a recent decision, the Fair Work Commission has applied the test recently confirmed by the High Court of Australia in CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 1 and ZG Operations Australia Pty Ltd v Jamsek [2022] HCA 2, in distinguishing between employees and contractors.


Full Bench looks at meaning of dismissed for the purposes of the unfair dismissal jurisdiction

Down but not out

The question of whether a demotion will constitute a dismissal under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was considered by the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission NSW Trains v James [2022] FWCFB 55.


Employer fails to disprove adverse action claim

Step back

A recent decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia has reaffirmed the standard of proof that is required to disprove allegations of unlawful adverse action under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.