Resources: Blog

Social Media and Industrial Action


Welcome to the 21st Century

Social media is also recognised as a powerful information sharing tool and many social movements are commenced and advanced online.

Most people use social media to keep in contact with family and friends, watch funny cat videos or to share a clever thought or pretty picture. However social media is also recognised as a powerful information sharing tool and many social movements are commenced and advanced online (think hashtags including #metoo, #loveislove).

It is not a surprise then that internet activism is also being utilised by employees in their industrial disputes. In June 2018, staff from the Bureau of Meteorology made clever efforts to broadcast and raise public support for pay increases during their pay negotiations with the Bureau. Their efforts included:

  • Inserting various hashtags such as “#BOMonSTRIKE”, “#5yearpayfreeze” and “SupportUs” in weather forecasts posted to Bureau social media accounts;
  • Inserting links to their online petition in tweets;
  • Reading out statements over live radio about their pay dispute; and
  • Sending out acrostic weather reports which spelled out “BOM ON STRIKE”.

In response to these actions, the Bureau instituted additional review measures, with social media posts checked by an administrator before they were posted online. The Bureau stated that it was required to put these measures into place because of its responsibility to ensure that its forecast and warning services were not compromised. These control measures were labelled by the Community and Public Sector Union as an attempt to “gag” staff.

What is industrial action?

Industrial action is usually characterised by protests, placards, stoppages and go slows. In this case, the actions taken by Bureau staff to utilise social media and hashtags were a novel way to communicate their cause.

Section 19 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) defines industrial action as:

(a) the performance of work by an employee in a way that is different from how it is usually performed which results in a restriction, limitation or a delay in the performance of the work;

(b) a ban, limitation or restriction on the performance of work by an employee or on the acceptance of or offering for work by an employee;

(c) a failure or refusal by employees to attend for work or perform work;

(d) the lockout of employees from their employment by the employer of the employees.

Industrial action is taken in the context of negotiating an enterprise agreement. Only certain types of industrial action are “protected” and there are strict requirements about when it can be taken.

With social media readily utilised by unions, industrial disputes are reaching a larger public audience then previously imagined. For example, in October 2017, the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union urged consumers to boycott Streets ice cream products as part of their “Streets Free Summer” campaign during negotiations for a new enterprise agreement. This campaign included a Facebook page and the use of the hashtag “#StreetsFreeSummer” to encourage customers not to purchase Streets ice creams.

Employers should be aware that a large amount of industrial action in the 21st century is now taking place over social media and can reach a larger audience, including customers. Employers should also be aware that unions and their members are increasingly active on social media – in May this year, a new online only union, Hospo Voice was launched to advocate for and assist its hospitality industry members. In short, when it comes to industrial action, employers need to be vigilant when it comes to managing the ‘virtual’ picket line not just the traditional picket line outside the company’s gates.


Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Workplace Relations Review

Cases and Legislation September 2020

The Queensland Government recently passed legislation amending the Criminal Code Act 1899 (the Code) to criminalise wage theft by employers in Queensland.‍The Criminal Code and Other Legislation (Wage Theft) Amendment Bill 2020 (the Bill) was introduced to the Queensland Parliament in response to a Report released in 2018 by the Queensland Parliamentary Education, Employment and Small Business Committee following an inquiry into wage theft in Queensland. The Report identified critical issues in wage theft as well as deliberate action taken by employers to frustrate employees’ attempts to recover entitlements.


Workplace Relations Review

Cases and Legislation June 2020

Cases and Legislation June 2020 NEWS ALERTS NSW Work Health Safety Legislation Amendments The Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) (WHS Act) was recently amended giving effect to some of the recommendations of the 2018 national review of the modern WHS Act. ...


Workplace Relations Review

Cases and Legislation February 2020

Cases and Legislation February 2020 Post-Employment Conduct “Ex-employee fined for contempt after breaching Court undertakings" Maxilift Australia Pty Ltd v Donnelly [2020] SASC 8 Executive summary A former sales manager has been fined $7,115 and found in contempt of...


FWC upholds objection to constructive dismissal claim

Construction zone

In order to access the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, an employee must be “dismissed” from their employment by the employer. One of the instances in which an employee may be “dismissed” from their employment is if they were forced to resign because of the employer’s conduct or course of conduct.


Court penalises accountant for involvement in employer’s failure to keep employee records

Put your records on

The Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) impose a number of obligations on employers with respect to the making and keeping of employee records and pay slips.


The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.