Resources: Blog

Record keeping basics for human resources


Who holds the record?

No profession loves hard copies of records more than lawyers – but it is often human resources who have the most to do with record keeping, particularly in relation to retaining employee records.

No profession loves hard copies of records more than lawyers – but it is often human resources who have the most to do with record keeping, particularly in relation to retaining employee records.

What are the basic records which should be kept for employees?

There are records which employers are required to keep in accordance with the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth). These records include, but are not limited, to the nature of the employment, commencement date, pay, overtime, leave records, superannuation and the termination of employment.

Ideally, employee records should reflect the employee lifecycle from beginning to end, so that employers have an accurate record of the employment relationship.

The record of an employee’s commencement of employment is crucial because it is at the start of the lifecycle where a flurry of documentation is created which needs to be retained.

Indeed, employers start collecting information about prospective employees during the recruitment process. It is at this stage that a prospective employee will send in their resume or CV, a copy of their qualifications and other information, such as working with children clearances, which may be required for the role. Some employers may also require candidates to complete applications for employment which contain relevant information about the person’s background and experience. It is important to retain this information for the pre-employment check process, in order to verify qualifications and clearances (and have a record that such checks were conducted). These records may also be useful if it is later discovered that the employee was less than truthful during the recruitment process.

The employment offer and the acceptance of the offer should also remain on file, together with any new contracts or variations that are agreed with the employee during the course of the employment.

Upon commencement, employees usually complete an onboarding and induction process. The induction of new employees is critical for compliance reasons – and so a record of the induction should be kept to show that the employee was properly instructed and trained into a safe system of work.

It is during employment, when HR has less direct involvement with the employee, that employee records can often be scant or incomplete. HR should impress upon managers the importance of keeping records of any training completed by employees, performance appraisals and performance management discussions – informal and formal. These records are often crucial when a decision needs to be made about the employee’s employment or when those records need to be relied upon if there is a claim, for example, of unfair dismissal or adverse action.

Paperless record keeping

Most businesses have embraced electronic document management systems as a means of keeping employee records. Gone are the days where personnel files were in folders kept in cupboards under lock and key, guarded by HR. However, just because files are not there physically does not mean that good record keeping practices should not be maintained.

As with all paperless systems, it is important that employee records created are retained. This may mean that some time is spent in setting up processes for capturing all information relating to employees from across the business. Managers who usually correspond directly with their direct reports should ensure that a copy is also sent to HR so that a copy is retained on the employee’s file. It will be of little use if a manager’s email to an employee about performance concerns, or record of discussion between a manager and employee about conduct is not kept on the employee’s file.

By setting up your employee record system to reflect the different stages in the employment lifecycle, employers are assured of capturing all information relevant to the employee and will be able to retrieve and rely on such information if required.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Employer ordered to pay maximum compensation following “entirely unjust” disciplinary process

Knives Out

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) requires that employers comply with a number of procedural elements in a disciplinary process prior to making a decision about whether an employee’s conduct or behaviour warrants disciplinary action.


The onus and presumption in adverse action matters

It’s on you

Under the general protections provisions in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act), it is unlawful for a person to take adverse action against another person for a proscribed reason. One of the features of the general protections provisions under the FW Act is the presumption that adverse action was taken for a proscribed reason unless it is proven that the adverse action was not taken for that reason.


Probation and the “minimum employment period” in the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

The probation myth

There is a common misconception that probationary periods allow an employer to dismiss an employee for any reason (or for no reason at all) prior to the confirmation of their employment. This is not necessarily the case and, in fact, there is no statutory basis that entitles an employer and an employee to a probationary period.


FWC finds sexually explicit Facebook post warranted dismissal, despite the employer’s ‘rather unusual’ workplace culture

Not so ‘funny’ meme

The workplace culture of an organisation should reflect the values that the business upholds and expects of its employees. It is becoming increasingly challenging for employers and employees to understand where a line is drawn between a relaxed and open workplace culture and a workplace culture that tolerates inappropriate behaviour.


Casual employee unfairly dismissed for Facebook recommendation

Halt before you post

Social media and employee’s conduct online has without doubt added a layer to the employer and employee relationship. While employees may think that their online activities done outside of work hours may be private, their conduct online may become relevant to their employment, for example, where it may disparage their employer, other employees or clients.


Vaccinations and the workplace

Shots fired

One of the most topical questions for employers during the COVID-19 pandemic has been whether they need to introduce policies that mandate vaccinations and, if so, what can be done to enforce them in the workplace.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.