[No] ticket to drive – A lesson for employers | Blogs

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence

Blogs

July 20, 2015

[No] ticket to drive – A lesson for employers

In the recent case of Mr Christopher K v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 3967 the Fair Work Commission confirmed that there will be a valid reason for the termination of an employee’s employment where they are unable to perform the inherent requirements of their position.

In the recent case of Mr Christopher K v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 3967 the Fair Work Commission confirmed that there will be a valid reason for the termination of an employee’s employment where they are unable to perform the inherent requirements of their position.

In this matter, Mr K was employed as a full-time truck driver for Linfox at its Newcastle site. Earlier this year, whilst driving his own vehicle, Mr K was charged with, and later pleaded guilty to a mid-range driving offence. Mr K’s request to use his leave or be redeployed to another position to cover the 8 month licence suspension period was refused. Linfox terminated Mr K’s employment on the basis that as a truck driver, he was unable to perform the inherent requirements of his position because of the loss of his licence.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) agreed that Mr K’s inability to perform the inherent requirements of his position was a valid reason for the termination and found that his dismissal was not unfair, unjust or unreasonable in the circumstances. The FWC considered that it was not unreasonable for Linfox to determine that it was unable to accommodate Mr K for the 8 month suspension period until he was able to return to his duties.

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence – particularly when it is for an extended period of time but it is important to be able to demonstrate:

How the inability of the employee to drive (due to the drivers’ licence suspension) means he/she can’t fulfil the inherent requirements of the position.

Why it is not reasonable to accommodate the employee by making changes in the workplace (this may also include consideration of the duration of any drivers’ licence suspension). In looking at this an employer will need to consider whether the employee can be redeployed to another worksite, department/area or position or whether the driving duties be assigned to another employee.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

April 29, 2025

Events

FWC finds employer’s assumptions about employee’s capacity rendered dismissal unfair

You need to chill out

If an employer is questioning the capacity of an ill or injured worker’s ability to fulfil the inherent requirements of their position, they may consider testing the legitimacy of an employee’s prognoses and medical advice. In these circumstances, the employer should be aware of their obligations to the employee and the potential consequences of failing to satisfy them.

March 27, 2025

Blogs

FWC finds summary dismissal not warranted despite employee’s misconduct

A not-so serious problem

In the recent unfair dismissal decision of Carmody v Bureau Veritas Minerals Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 259, the FWC has clarified what will (or will not) constitute ‘serious misconduct’ warranting summary dismissal in the context of managing employee performance.

March 13, 2025

FWC upholds summary dismissal of employee who refused to provide medical information confirming fitness to work

If you refuse you lose

Where there are concerns about an employee’s fitness to work, employers may rely on terms in their employment contract which require the employee to comply with the reasonable and lawful direction to undergo a medical assessment.

June 10, 2025

Blogs

QIRC rejects unfair dismissal claim due to clear evidence of misconduct

Swear by it

Employers have a responsibility to address and manage poor conduct and behaviour which may expose other workers to work health and safety risks in the workplace. Implementation of effective disciplinary processes are vital in curbing such risks that may lead to a poor workplace culture, which may in turn create psychosocial hazards.

June 10, 2025

Blogs

Third maximum term contract role not substantially similar work

Not the same

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) limiting the use of fixed term and maximum term contracts prohibit employers from providing employees with successive term contracts, unless an exception applies.

May 27, 2025

Resources: Blogs

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence