Resources: Blogs

Employer was found guilty of failing to ensure that persons other than employees were not exposed to risks to their health and safety

Blogs
|

Inadequate' WHS Penalty Increased Seven-fold on Appeal

In June this year, a Victorian textiles company was fined $7,000 for breaching work health and safety laws when a subcontractor truck driver was floored by a 185kg bale of wool. In an appeal of that decision earlier this month, the County Court of Victoria increased the penalty to $50,000 when the Office of Public Prosecutions successfully argued that the $7,000 fine was inadequate.

In June this year, a Victorian textiles company was fined $7,000 for breaching work health and safety laws when a subcontractor truck driver was floored by a 185kg bale of wool. In an appeal of that decision earlier this month, the County Court of Victoria increased the penalty to $50,000 when the Office of Public Prosecutions successfully argued that the $7,000 fine was inadequate.

The incident that sparked the proceedings occurred when the truck driver left the cabin of his truck to prepare the trailer of wool bales for unloading in the employer’s warehouse. A forklift operator had already begun unloading the trailer and dislodged a bale that struck the driver, knocking him unconscious. The truck driver spent 2 days in hospital and suffered a head injury and ligament damage to his knee.

The employer was found guilty of failing to ensure that persons other than employees were not exposed to risks to their health and safety.

The OPP argued that the employer had failed to provide delivery drivers with site inductions or safety instructions, and had only given forklift operators verbal safety instructions. The court found that whilst the employer did have a traffic management plan in place, it had failed to ensure that the plan was followed.

This case presents another reminder to employers about the importance of ensuring that everyone within a workplace understands their work health and safety (WHS) obligations and that Safe Work Method Statements, inductions and regular training sessions are routinely conducted. Written policies and procedures must be current and communicated to all employees, contractors and other visitors to the workplace.

As mentioned in one of our previous blogs - Ah Yes, The Safety Dance: WHS is an Issue for Everyone, WHS planning, training and induction are sometimes viewed as an unnecessary costs that don’t serve the bottom line of a business. However, good WHS policies, procedures and training can save an organisation a lot in the long run - not only will employees be working a in safe environment but employers will save money on lost productivity as a result of employee injuries or illness, enjoy the benefits of lower workers compensation premiums and may avoid WHS convictions and hefty fines. In short, employers who proactively invest in good WHS systems and training will reap the benefits in the long term.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Court finds sole director failed to exercise due diligence in fatality prosecution

The Model Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) imposes a positive duty on officers to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking complies with its work health and safety duties and obligations.

Read more...

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

High Court rules on scope of inquiry of redeployment within an employers enterprise

That’s not how this works

In “Where does it end?” we looked at the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2024] FCAFC 45. In that decision, the Full Federal Court refused an application from an employer seeking orders to quash previous decisions and compel the Fair Work Commission from further dealing with unfair dismissal applications lodged by employees who had been made redundant.

Read more...

Mad Mex franchisee to pay $305,000 in damages for sexual harassment claim

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) protects employees from sexual harassment, and as part of the Respect@Work amendments now prohibits sex-based harassment.

Read more...

FWC rejects constructive dismissal claim, finding the employment ended by “mutual agreement”

Mutually beneficial

For an employee to have access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that the employee was “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required