Resources: Blogs

When things get “personnel”

Blogs
|

HR manager dismissed for failing to return personnel file

In a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) (B v Conair Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 6520) a HR manager was found to have been fairly dismissed after taking her personnel file from her employer’s premises and not returning it when directed to do so.

In a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) (B v Conair Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 6520) a HR manager was found to have been fairly dismissed after taking her personnel file from her employer’s premises and not returning it when directed to do so.

Up until her suspension, the HR manager had a good work record, but an issue with a fellow manager during and after a particular meeting resulted in the HR manager being placed on “special leave.” On her way out, the HR manager removed her own HR file from the employer’s records and took it with her.

During the period of “special leave”, on a number of occasions, the employer’s solicitors wrote to the HR manager’s solicitors requesting that the HR manager return the personnel file or provide information about its whereabouts. In those letters, the HR manager was put on notice that failing to do as directed may breach her duties as an employee and as a result, her employment may be at risk.

Neither the employer nor its solicitors received any response regarding the personnel file for some time and so, the employer made the decision to terminate the HR manager’s employment. The reasons given for the decision were the HR manager’s misconduct in failing to follow a lawful and reasonable direction given by the employer. Namely, the HR manager did not return the personnel file or provide information about its location when directed to do so.

The HR manager then made an unfair dismissal claim arguing that she took the file to protect herself because she was concerned that it would be altered. The HR manager also argued that the employer didn’t have a valid reason for dismissing her because she didn’t receive its direction to return the file – apparently her solicitors never passed on the message.

The FWC found that it was reasonable for the employer to assume that the complete failure on behalf of the HR manager and her solicitors to respond to the employer’s demands for the HR file to be returned represented a deliberate refusal to comply with the employer’s lawful and reasonable directions. Furthermore, the HR manager didn’t return the file until the morning of the first day of the FWC hearing. The FWC said that this conduct alone was enough to establish a valid reason for dismissal.

The FWC ultimately held that the dismissal was not unfair and dismissed the HR manager’s claim.

This case should give employer’s confidence that if they issue a reasonable and lawful direction to an employee but receive no response, it can look to take disciplinary action against the employee, up to and including the termination of their employment.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.

Read more...

Commission finds swearing in workplace constituted sexual harassment and warranted summary dismissal

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

With the new Respect@Work amendments now in place, employers should be mindful of a recent decision handed down by the Fair Work Commission where it upheld the dismissal of an employee on the basis that swearing at a colleague constituted sexual harassment.

Read more...

Northern Territory Station Farm Manager validly dismissed for fighting with employee and using lewd language

Country and Western

In the first of a two-part blog series, we look at inappropriate conduct and behaviour in the workplace and the importance of dealing with problematic workplace behaviour.

Read more...

The “practical reality” test confirms that an individual was an employee and not an independent contractor

Game over

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was amended last year to introduce a new test for determining if an individual is an employee or an independent contractor.

Read more...

No “cause-and-effect” relationship between employee’s request for flexible working arrangements and their parental responsibilities

Request denied

An employee will only be eligible to request flexible working arrangements if their request for changed arrangements is “because of” one of the prescribed circumstances set out under section 65(1A) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Employee who refused drug and alcohol test unfairly dismissed

Guilty by association

Employees have a duty to comply with their employer’s lawful and reasonable directions made under certain workplace policies. However, if an employer fails to apply their policies fairly, then the direction may be found not to be reasonable or lawful and any subsequent disciplinary action for non-compliance with that direction may found to be unfair.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required