Resources: Blogs

When things get “personnel”

Blogs
|

HR manager dismissed for failing to return personnel file

In a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) (B v Conair Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 6520) a HR manager was found to have been fairly dismissed after taking her personnel file from her employer’s premises and not returning it when directed to do so.

In a recent decision of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) (B v Conair Australia Pty Ltd [2016] FWC 6520) a HR manager was found to have been fairly dismissed after taking her personnel file from her employer’s premises and not returning it when directed to do so.

Up until her suspension, the HR manager had a good work record, but an issue with a fellow manager during and after a particular meeting resulted in the HR manager being placed on “special leave.” On her way out, the HR manager removed her own HR file from the employer’s records and took it with her.

During the period of “special leave”, on a number of occasions, the employer’s solicitors wrote to the HR manager’s solicitors requesting that the HR manager return the personnel file or provide information about its whereabouts. In those letters, the HR manager was put on notice that failing to do as directed may breach her duties as an employee and as a result, her employment may be at risk.

Neither the employer nor its solicitors received any response regarding the personnel file for some time and so, the employer made the decision to terminate the HR manager’s employment. The reasons given for the decision were the HR manager’s misconduct in failing to follow a lawful and reasonable direction given by the employer. Namely, the HR manager did not return the personnel file or provide information about its location when directed to do so.

The HR manager then made an unfair dismissal claim arguing that she took the file to protect herself because she was concerned that it would be altered. The HR manager also argued that the employer didn’t have a valid reason for dismissing her because she didn’t receive its direction to return the file – apparently her solicitors never passed on the message.

The FWC found that it was reasonable for the employer to assume that the complete failure on behalf of the HR manager and her solicitors to respond to the employer’s demands for the HR file to be returned represented a deliberate refusal to comply with the employer’s lawful and reasonable directions. Furthermore, the HR manager didn’t return the file until the morning of the first day of the FWC hearing. The FWC said that this conduct alone was enough to establish a valid reason for dismissal.

The FWC ultimately held that the dismissal was not unfair and dismissed the HR manager’s claim.

This case should give employer’s confidence that if they issue a reasonable and lawful direction to an employee but receive no response, it can look to take disciplinary action against the employee, up to and including the termination of their employment.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.

Read more...

Commission finds swearing in workplace constituted sexual harassment and warranted summary dismissal

R-E-S-P-E-C-T

With the new Respect@Work amendments now in place, employers should be mindful of a recent decision handed down by the Fair Work Commission where it upheld the dismissal of an employee on the basis that swearing at a colleague constituted sexual harassment.

Read more...

Northern Territory Station Farm Manager validly dismissed for fighting with employee and using lewd language

Country and Western

In the first of a two-part blog series, we look at inappropriate conduct and behaviour in the workplace and the importance of dealing with problematic workplace behaviour.

Read more...

FWC upholds summary dismissal of employee who refused to provide medical information confirming fitness to work

If you refuse you lose

Where there are concerns about an employee’s fitness to work, employers may rely on terms in their employment contract which require the employee to comply with the reasonable and lawful direction to undergo a medical assessment.

Read more...

QIRC rejects unfair dismissal claim due to clear evidence of misconduct

Swear by it

Employers have a responsibility to address and manage poor conduct and behaviour which may expose other workers to work health and safety risks in the workplace. Implementation of effective disciplinary processes are vital in curbing such risks that may lead to a poor workplace culture, which may in turn create psychosocial hazards.

Read more...

Third maximum term contract role not substantially similar work

Not the same

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) limiting the use of fixed term and maximum term contracts prohibit employers from providing employees with successive term contracts, unless an exception applies.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required