Resources: Blogs

Pick and pay

Blogs
|

FWO crackdown on piecework rates

Last month, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) launched unprecedented legal action in the Federal Court against a large mushroom farm that paid hundreds of its employees based on how much they picked at a rate of 60 to 80 cents per kilogram. It is alleged that the employees had been exploited and underpaid almost $650,000 in eight months.

Last month, the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) launched unprecedented legal action in the Federal Court against a large mushroom farm that paid hundreds of its employees based on how much they picked at a rate of 60 to 80 cents per kilogram. It is alleged that the employees had been exploited and underpaid almost $650,000 in eight months.

A piecework rate is payable where an employee gets paid per piece of work completed. This means the employee gets paid a certain amount for each item picked, packed, pruned or made. When an employee receives a piecework rate, this is paid instead of an hourly rate of pay.

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides limited circumstances where an employee can be paid piecework rates. These include where:

  • An award or registered agreement allows for piece rate payments;
  • The employee isn’t covered by an award or registered agreement.

An award that does provide for piecework rates is the Horticulture Award 2010 and this was applicable to the mushroom farm employees.

Under the Award, an employee can be paid piecework rates; however, the employee must on average earn at least 15% more per hour than the minimum hourly rate prescribed under the Award for the applicable classification. There is also a requirement that if the employee is a casual, they receive the casual loading in addition to the piece work rate. The piecework arrangement must be in writing and be a genuine agreement. Time and wages records must be kept by the employer.

This case will be a test for the FW Act with respect to piecework rates and may impact not only on the Horticulture sector but also the Textiles, Clothing and Footwear industries that also utilise piecework rates.

Employers are reminded that if an employee is entitled to receive piece work rates and are paid accordingly, the employee must receive at least what they would have received had they been paid in accordance with the relevant industrial instrument.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

ICYMI: FWO’s Payroll Remediation Program guide

Employers have obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) to pay employees their minimum entitlements for work performed.

Read more...

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.

Read more...

FWC finds refusal of flexible working request did not force employee to resign

Bend or break

For an employee to bring a general protections claim involving dismissal, they must be able to demonstrate that they were “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

Read more...

High Court rules on scope of inquiry of redeployment within an employers enterprise

That’s not how this works

In “Where does it end?” we looked at the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2024] FCAFC 45. In that decision, the Full Federal Court refused an application from an employer seeking orders to quash previous decisions and compel the Fair Work Commission from further dealing with unfair dismissal applications lodged by employees who had been made redundant.

Read more...

Mad Mex franchisee to pay $305,000 in damages for sexual harassment claim

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) protects employees from sexual harassment, and as part of the Respect@Work amendments now prohibits sex-based harassment.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required