Resources: Blog

FOMODA: Fear of Missing Out on Disciplinary Action

Blog
|

Where employee misbehaviour or misconduct occurs, it should be addressed immediately in the workplace, if it is not, the employer is seen to have “lost” or waived the opportunity to take corrective disciplinary action.

The Fair Work Commission has often held that a dismissal will be found to be harsh, unjust or unreasonable when one of the reasons for the termination of employment included an event which occurred earlier and which was not addressed at the time. This is encapsulated in the concept of “use it or lose it”.

The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) has often held that a dismissal will be found to be harsh, unjust or unreasonable when one of the reasons for the termination of employment included an event which occurred earlier and which was not addressed at the time. This is encapsulated in the concept of “use it or lose it”.

Where employee misbehaviour or misconduct occurs, it should be addressed immediately in the workplace, if it is not, the employer is seen to have “lost” or waived the opportunity to take corrective disciplinary action.

The Commission has used the same approach when considering whether an employer’s disciplinary action was bullying or reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

In Ms Belinda Brown v Park Beach Bowling Club Limited; Ms Kelly Walcot and Mr Grant Walden [2017] FWC 896, the employee claimed that she was bullied by the Park Beach Bowling Club (the Club) management. She claimed that she was treated unfairly and subjected to inconsistent disciplinary action.

The employee was employed as a casual food and bar attendant by the Club and made a number of allegations that she was bullied. In particular, the employee alleged that she was subjected to unreasonable actions by the Club when it investigated complaints from two employees against her. One complaint concerned an allegation that in October 2015 Ms Brown commented “Maybe I have to put on 80 kg before I can get recognised for an award” about another employee who received a recognition award from the Club.

The Club first received this complaint in October 2015 and it was investigated over the course of November 2015. The employee was advised a number of times between February and May 2016 that the investigation did not find that she made the comment, so no action would be taken against her and that the matter was closed. Despite advising the employee of this, in October 2016, the Club issued the employee with a warning letter in relation to making inappropriate and insulting comments toward the other employee.

The Commission was critical of the Club’s actions in issuing a warning letter to the employee having earlier told her that no further action would be taken. The Commission held that the Club’s decision to issue the employee with a warning letter relating to an incident which occurred nearly twelve months earlier was unreasonable and was not reasonable management action carried out in a reasonable manner.

Despite this finding in relation to the warning letter, the Commission dismissed the employee’s other allegations of unreasonable behaviour by the Club and found that the Club acted reasonably toward the employee. Accordingly, there was no repeated unreasonable behaviour toward the employee. The Commission found that the employee had not been bullied at work and dismissed the application.

Employee misbehaviour should be addressed at first instance and should not be left to be addressed at a later time. Certainly a disciplinary process would be very likely to be considered unreasonable if an employer firstly advised an employee that no disciplinary action will be taken only to (much) later, with the “fear of missing out on taking disciplinary action”, issue the employee with a warning.

 

Similar articles

Fair Work Commission upholds dismissal of an employee who misused a company coffee account

Caffeine Hit

Financial misconduct committed by an employee can fundamentally damage the trust and confidence in an employment relationship. Unfortunately, financial misconduct is a common issue for Australian businesses and if it is not dealt with promptly and effectively, there is an opportunity for further misadventure.

Read more...

FWC upholds dismissal of an employee who repeatedly and deliberately accessed customer’s confidential information without authorisation

Celebrity search

During the course of their employment, employees may have access to confidential information which belongs to their employer. This information may be in the form of personal information provided by customers and is therefore sensitive in nature.

Read more...

Fair Work Commission critical of investigation process despite the employer’s valid reason for dismissal

Less is more

Employers often see the disciplinary process as an opportunity to raise every single indiscretion by an employee – even though the issues occurred in the past or are minor in nature when compared to other misconduct. However, this approach can weaken the employer’s position, rather than strengthen the decision to dismiss.

Read more...

Commission finds mask mandate to be a lawful and reasonable direction

Mask up

Employees have a duty to comply with lawful and reasonable directions from their employer. In the current COVID-19 context, a key concern for employers is whether it is lawful and reasonable to issue directions related to safety matters arising from the pandemic.

Read more...

Lack of consultation rendered mandatory vaccination requirement unreasonable

Talk before you walk

Consultation with employees always plays an important part when introducing changes in the workplace. Under work health and safety legislation, employers have a duty to consult with their workers as far as reasonably practicable in relation to health and safety matters.

Read more...

Offers of alternative employment in redundancy cases

An offer you can refuse

In most cases of redundancy, employers have an obligation to consult with affected employees about the proposed redundancy and consider whether or not anything can be done to mitigate or minimise the impact on the employee, such as redeployment or obtaining other acceptable employment for the employee.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.