Resources: Blogs

The Undertaker

Blogs
|

Enforceable Undertakings under the WHS Act

In part one of our three part series we discussed improvement and prohibition notices under the Model Work Health and Safety Act. In this second part we will focus on enforceable (or WHS) undertakings.

In part one of our three part series we discussed improvement and prohibition notices under the Model Work Health and Safety Act. In this second part we will focus on enforceable (or WHS) undertakings.

An enforceable undertaking is an agreement between an organisation and the regulatory authority (e.g. Safe Work NSW) to do certain things to improve the health and safety in the workplace and may also involve some health and safety initiatives in the organisation’s industry and provide some benefit to the broader community.

Part 11 of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) (WHS Act) addresses enforceable undertakings and specifically states that written enforceable undertakings may be accepted by Safe Work NSW for offences committed other than for a category 1 offence (i.e. reckless conduct).

The benefit of an enforceable undertaking is that Safe Work NSW or applicable regulatory authority will not bring court proceedings against the offending organisation on the condition that the organisation complies with the enforceable undertaking.

Organisations need to be aware that enforceable undertakings are not an easy way out of legal proceedings and compliance with the same often requires a lot of time, effort and money. Furthermore, the applicable regulatory authority may use its discretion not to allow an organisation to adopt an enforceable undertaking.

For example CSR Martini Pty Limited (CSR Martini) recently entered into an enforceable undertaking with SafeWork NSW worth more than $390,000.00. CSR Martini was alleged to have contravened sections 19(1) and 32 of the WHS Act on 2 July 2014 when an employee suffered a crush injury after his foot was drawn into an unguarded section of a machine.

The enforceable undertaking requires CSR Martini to:

  • Conduct WHS training for the entire workforce, including management and the Board;
  • Conduct audits and identify and implement action plans in relation to guarding, working at heights and manual handling;
  • Develop and implement a safety exchange program focussing on key areas of WHS on site (including hazard identification, traffic management, housekeeping, workplace health initiatives and manual handling initiatives);
  • Produce a video of the relevant incident, the lessons learned from it and share that with the broader industry (to be approved by SafeWork NSW before its release);
  • Sponsor a community fun run event in November 2017 and promote key safety messages as part of that event;
  • Ensure that the site is audited by an accredited WHS auditor under the relevant standard and that the actions arising from that audit are implemented; and
  • Develop and maintain a WHS management system that complies with the AS/NZS 4804:2001.

This undertaking is a good example of how an organisation has to not only commit to the organisation itself (and its other sites) but also the industry (through training and videos) and the community (by sponsoring a fun run to promote to the community the importance of safety in the workplace). Through these commitments, enforceable undertakings are able to provide sustainable and measureable WHS initiatives that will deliver benefits to a range of stakeholders.

 

Contraventions of an Enforceable Undertaking

The regulatory authorities and the courts take the commitments provided in enforceable undertakings very seriously. In fact, section 219 of the WHS Act provides that if there is a contravention of an enforceable undertaking, the maximum penalty in the case of an individual is $50,000 or in the case of a body corporate, $250,000.

In addition, Safe Work NSW can apply to the District Court for an order to direct the individual or body corporate to comply with the enforceable undertaking and/or an order to discharge the enforceable undertaking.

 

Similar articles

Court finds sole director failed to exercise due diligence in fatality prosecution

The Model Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) imposes a positive duty on officers to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking complies with its work health and safety duties and obligations.

Read more...

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

High Court rules on scope of inquiry of redeployment within an employers enterprise

That’s not how this works

In “Where does it end?” we looked at the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2024] FCAFC 45. In that decision, the Full Federal Court refused an application from an employer seeking orders to quash previous decisions and compel the Fair Work Commission from further dealing with unfair dismissal applications lodged by employees who had been made redundant.

Read more...

Mad Mex franchisee to pay $305,000 in damages for sexual harassment claim

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) protects employees from sexual harassment, and as part of the Respect@Work amendments now prohibits sex-based harassment.

Read more...

FWC rejects constructive dismissal claim, finding the employment ended by “mutual agreement”

Mutually beneficial

For an employee to have access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that the employee was “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required