Resources: Blogs

Off the clock

Blogs
|

Employer interest in employee’s out of work conduct

Employers are often uncertain as to how to deal with the out of work hours conduct of employees.

As highlighted last week in our blog – The importance of procedural fairness – “it’s all about the process" former Cronulla Sharks (the Club) player Todd Carney and his legal advisors indicated that legal action would be initiated against the Club.

Carney has claimed that the Club did not afford him with procedural fairness when it terminated his contract for his off-field indiscretion.

Employers are often uncertain as to how to deal with the out of work hours conduct of employees.

While employees generally can do as they please in their private time, employers may have an interest in the employee’s activities where the conduct:

  • Can damage the interests or reputation of the employer;
  • Is incompatible with the employee’s duties with the employer; or
  • Could seriously damage the employment relationship between the employer and the employee.

For example, out of work conduct involving dishonesty with money or goods, or violence, bullying, harassment, discrimination, criminal conduct or intimidation could be relevant to employment that is in the public eye, involves law enforcement or a relationship of trust with the employer’s customers or clients.

With the rise of social media, it is increasingly common for the out of work hours conduct of an employee to move from the private sphere to the public. For example an employee’s Facebook post “venting” about their job or workplace may be seen by other employees, clients or customers, and be of such a nature that the posting of them in public forums damages the reputation of the business and/or result in the loss of revenue, clients and/or customers for the employer.

Having a carefully drafted Code of Conduct or other policies is the starting point for managing the out of work hours conduct of employees. Such policies should outline the expectations of employees and that disciplinary action may be taken where their out of work hours conduct has a connection with or impact on the employment. It is also important to provide training for employees in what is expected of them and also in how their out of hours conduct, even on social media, can impact on the relationship between the employer and employee.

Obviously, there is a line beyond which it is not reasonable to have an interest in an employee’s out of work hours activities and there are plenty of jobs where any sort of outside work conduct would have no bearing on the employment relationship. Commonsense should prevail and employers should think carefully before linking outside work conduct to the employment relationship.

Next week we will look at the important things employers should consider in the disciplinary process.

 

Similar articles

Commission finds inappropriate social media use formed valid reason for dismissal

Message delivered

A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed that an employee’s inappropriate use of social media group chats may form a valid reason for dismissal, particularly when matters relating to work are discussed.

Read more...

Prevention is better than a cure

Planning end of year work celebrations

As the end of another year approaches, employers are understandingly planning a well-earned opportunity for employees to celebrate the year that has been.

Read more...

FWC highlights the importance of a social media policy to safeguard employers’ reputations

An unwanted footprint

Employees have a duty to ensure that their out of hours conduct (including social media posts) is not contrary to the obligations they owe to their employer. Further employees should also ensure that out of hours conduct is not in breach of workplace policies or damaging to the reputation of their employer.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

$15.3 million in penalties imposed on sushi restaurants and director for serious contraventions

Put your records on

The director and Chief Executive Officer of a group of four sushi restaurants which operated in NSW, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory was recently ordered to pay $1.6 million for her involvement in contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) by the Federal Court of Australia.

Read more...

Finishing up employee in notice period amounted to termination

Until it’s time for you to go

Employers often do not require (or desire) employees to work through their notice period. This is particularly the case if an employee has provided resignation of their employment and are disruptive to the workplace.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.