Resources: Blog

Employee found to have bullied co-worker to join union not unfairly dismissed

Blog
|

To join or not to join...

In King v The Trustee for Bartlett Family Trust T/A Concept Wire Industries [2017] FWC 3867, the Fair Work Commission considered an unfair dismissal application where an employee was dismissed after it was found that he bullied another employee about joining the union.

Bullying complaints can often be difficult to manage and investigate, particularly when they involve allegations about the exercise of a workplace right to join or not join a union.

In King v The Trustee for Bartlett Family Trust T/A Concept Wire Industries [2017] FWC 3867, the Fair Work Commission (FWC) considered an unfair dismissal application where an employee was dismissed after it was found that he bullied another employee about joining the union.

Mr King was employed by Concept Wire Industries (the Employer), a family owned business with 25 employees. On 17 October 2016, Mr King attended a meeting with an official of the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (the Union) where the election of a site delegate was discussed. Mr King, a union member, expressed interest in becoming the delegate and sought to encourage others to attend the meeting.

A few days after the meeting, an employee lodged a complaint against Mr King, alleging that Mr King engaged in behaviour that made him feel threatened, intimidated and bullied. The employee claimed that Mr King approached him on four occasions pressuring him to join the Union with the threat that if he didn’t he would “find a way to sack him” and would isolate him from others.

Mr King denied the allegations.

The Employer undertook a preliminary investigation and then determined that a formal external investigation should be conducted.

The external investigator interviewed a number of employees and, although there were no witnesses to the interaction, found the allegations to be substantiated based on the strength of the evidence from the employee. The Employer terminated Mr King’s employment due to misconduct based on his behaviour toward the employee.

In the FWC, the employee gave evidence that he was anxious about his interactions with Mr King and that Mr King knew that he was fearful about losing his job. Mr King denied the allegations and submitted that he spoke to many employees about the Union meeting and that his interactions with the employee about the Union were brief.

In considering whether the termination of Mr King’s employment was harsh, unjust or unreasonable, the FWC firstly considered whether there was a valid reason for the dismissal. The FWC had regard to a number of matters including that:

  • Mr King had workplace rights to assist the Union in the workplace and approach the employee (even more than once) to persuade him to join the Union using reasonable conduct;
  • The employee had an “equally important” workplace right not to join the Union and the workplace right not to be subjected to workplace bullying;
  • The Employer had an obligation to ensure a safe workplace which was free from workplace bullying and an obligation to act upon complaints of bullying it received; and
  • The external investigation was meticulous and balanced and was used by the Employer when considering terminating Mr King’s employment.

The FWC found that there was a valid reason for dismissing Mr King and that, procedurally, the termination of Mr King’s employment was fair. Accordingly, the unfair dismissal application was dismissed.

 

Lessons for employers

This decision highlights to employers:

  • Employees do not have to join or not join a Union nor should they feel pressured or intimidated to do so.
  • The obligation on employers to prevent or respond to complaints of workplace bullying.
  • An external investigation may be required where serious or complex allegations are made.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Commission orders employer to pay compensation as a result of its procedurally unfair disciplinary process

Procedurally disastrous

When investigating allegations of misconduct against an employee in the workplace, employers must ensure that any ensuing disciplinary process is kept distinct from and separate to from the investigation.

Read more...

Commission rejects constructive dismissal claim after finding performance review process did not force employee to resign

Full force denied

For an employee to access the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, they must be “dismissed” from their employment by the employer. In some instances, a resignation can be a “dismissal”, when an employee is forced to resign due to the employer’s conduct. This is referred to as a “constructive dismissal”.

Read more...

FWC rejects Applicants’ claim to access investigation documents

Privileged

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) has a broad power under section 590 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) to “inform itself in relation to any manner before it in such manner as it considers appropriate”. Under this general power, the FWC may inform itself by requiring the production of documents or records to the FWC (such as all documents or records relating to a dismissal process).

Read more...

Commission orders employer to pay compensation as a result of its procedurally unfair disciplinary process

Procedurally disastrous

When investigating allegations of misconduct against an employee in the workplace, employers must ensure that any ensuing disciplinary process is kept distinct from and separate to from the investigation.

Read more...

The importance of WHS refresher training

Not a “one and done” thing

It is an expected and necessary part of work health and safety (WHS) plans that all new workers receive relevant WHS training.

Read more...

Casual Terms Award Review 2021

NEWS UPDATE

In March 2021, the casual employment amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) introduced a new statutory definition of “casual employee” and an entitlement to casual conversion as one of the National Employment Standards (NES).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Signup to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to you inbox.