Resources: Blogs

Put your records on


Court penalises accountant for involvement in employer’s failure to keep employee records

The Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) impose a number of obligations on employers with respect to the making and keeping of employee records and pay slips.

The Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (FW Regulations) impose a number of obligations on employers with respect to the making and keeping of employee records and pay slips.

The FW Regulations set out what records an employer is required to hold and the period for which they must be kept.  The records that must be kept include a description of the nature of an employee’s employment, their pay and overtime, leave, superannuation and any individual flexibility agreements.

The FW Regulations also describe the specific details that an employer must set out on every pay slip that is provided to an employee such as the identity of the employer, the employee’s rate of pay, the gross and net amounts paid to an employee as well as the period in respect of which such payments are made.

These record-keeping obligations are important because they ensure that employees are properly informed about what they are paid and whether or not that pay is in accordance with their statutory entitlements. It is for this reason that a failure to comply with record-keeping obligations is often heavily penalised by the courts. Such penalties are not limited to employers but may also be imposed upon any person or company that is involved in the contravention.

Take, for example, the recent decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (the Court) in Fair Work Ombudsman v Austop Natural Therapy and Supplies Pty Ltd & Ors [2020] FCCA 2920. In this decision, an employer and its two directors were penalised for underpaying an employee a total of $13,521.68 during a period of seven months in 2017. The employee had been required to work 5-7 days a week, was paid cash on a commission-only basis (40-45% of the price of each massage performed) and was not provided with any pay slips.

The employer was also penalised for failing to keep employee records and pay slips in accordance with the FW Regulations, for keeping records that it knew were false and misleading and for using those false records by providing them to the Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO).

In addition to those penalties, the Court also issued penalties on the employer’s external accountant totalling $5,000.00 for its involvement in the employer’s contravention of the FW Regulations, pursuant to the accessorial liability provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).  The accountant was found to have been knowingly involved in the employer’s contraventions after it admitted to creating pay slips, with the authorisation of the employer, purported to be in relation to the employee’s employment. The payslips falsely showed that the employee was paid an hourly rate of pay, that overtime and annual leave taken was paid to the employee as well as incorrect gross and net amounts paid. The accountant then made use of those records, again with the authorisation of the employer, by providing the pay slips to a Fair Work Inspector in response to a Notice to Produce with the knowledge that the pay slips were false and misleading.

In determining the penalty to be imposed, the Court noted that the accountant had admitted to the contravention at an early stage of the matter and was co-operative, despite initially alleging that the pay slips were only prepared as an “example” of what the employee should have been paid. It also took into account that the accountant had changed its company name and had ceased providing accounting services.

However, the Court considered that there needed to be a strong disincentive to similar businesses who purportedly provide professional services. The Court also stated at [103] that higher penalties needed to be imposed in respect of a failure to comply with record-keeping and pay slip obligations “because a failure to comply with those provisions makes it very difficult for an employee to determine what their rate of pay is and whether they are being properly paid”.

Lessons for employers

As the Court stated in this decision, the keeping of accurate employee records and pay slips is a crucial aspect of Australia’s workplace laws. It ensures that employees are provided with the information needed to ascertain whether or not they are being paid correctly.

The failure to comply with this obligation does not simply rest on the employer. External companies who provide assistance to employers in relation to the payment of employees, such as accounting, payroll and bookkeeping firms, may also be found to be liable for an employer’s contraventions if they are involved.  

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.


HR Manager fined $7,600 for accessorial liability in adverse action against employee

Taking it personally

Last year, the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia found a HR Manager to be accessorily liable for his involvement in an employer’s unlawful adverse action against an employee after she proposed to exercise a workplace right, being her ability to initiate proceedings under a workplace law.


Court finds HR manager accessorily liable for adverse action claim

Supreme failure

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) contains provisions which make it possible for individuals to be found accessorily liable for their involvement in a contravention of a workplace law. In particular, section 550 of the FW Act provides that a person “involved in” a contravention will be taken to have contravened that provision themselves.


Commission confirms inappropriate touching constituted sexual harassment warranting summary dismissal

‘Scuse you

Sexual harassment in the workplace has been the subject of significant reform over the past few years, with an even greater onus on employers now to take proactive measures to minimise or eliminate the risk of sexual harassment in connection with work.


Employers delay sinks bid for injunctive relief

Speak now

When seeking to enforce a restraint, it is important that employers seek to enforce the restraint in a timely manner to prevent future or an ongoing breach. Any delay will be considered by the courts when assessing whether it is reasonable to enforce the restraint.


Two-year post-employment restraint on hairdresser found to be unreasonable

Splitting hairs

When it comes to drafting post-employment restraints in employment contracts, it is important for employers to consider the purpose of the restraint and whether or not the restraint reasonably serves that purpose.


Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.