Resources: Blogs

Don’t you know that you’re toxic?

Blogs
|

The consequences of inappropriate workplace conduct and behaviour

In the second blog of our two-part series on inappropriate conduct and behaviour, we continue our look at the consequences of failing to address poor conduct and behaviour in the workplace.

In the second blog of our two-part series on inappropriate conduct and behaviour, we continue our look at the consequences of failing to address poor conduct and behaviour in the workplace.

Safe Work Australia identifies that harmful behaviours including bullying, harassment, discrimination and workplace conflict or poor workplace relationships can cause psychosocial hazards. If left unaddressed, these harmful behaviours may cause psychological injury.  

In Nand v Toll Transport Pty Ltd [2022] NSWPIC 595, the employee was employed as a truck driver for Toll Transport Pty Ltd (the employer). The employee lodged a workers compensation claim alleging that he suffered a psychological injury. The employee alleged that during his employment, he:

  • was ridiculed and humiliated for having concerns about COVID-19 and for wearing masks and gloves during the COVID-19 pandemic;
  • was threatened by a co-worker who made a throat-slitting gesture toward him;
  • was threatened with dismissal for speaking to the union;
  • felt excluded by his co-workers who would make racists jokes about people of Indian ethnicity;
  • was made to feel uncomfortable by his co-workers who would use profanity;
  • was shown pornography by his co-workers, who would also make sexist and sexualised comments about women;
  • was subject to homophobic remarks when he spoke up against the sexist comments made by his co-workers; and
  • was assaulted by his supervisor.

The employee sought lump sum compensation for permanent impairment as a result of his psychological injury. Liability for the injury was declined by the insurer, relying on section 11A of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW) (WC Act). The insurer disputed that compensation was payable on the basis that the employee’s  psychological injury was wholly or predominantly caused by the reasonable action taken by the employer with respect to performance appraisal, discipline and/or dismissal.

While the NSW Personal Injury Commission (NSW PIC) accepted that the alleged assault was not supported by the evidence, it noted that case law accepted that an employee’s perception of real events in the workplace was sufficient for a finding of a work-related psychological injury. The evidence from the employer also supported the finding that the workplace was toxic and confrontational.

Accordingly, the NSW PIC found that the employee’s perception of the real events was the main contributing factor to the injury and as such he suffered a compensable injury. The NSW PIC also found that the insurer’s reliance on section 11A failed because the employee’s injury was multifactorial and therefore, performance appraisal or disciplinary process was not the sole or predominant cause of the employee’s injury.

Lessons for employers

Harmful behaviour caused by poor and inappropriate conduct and behaviour can give rise to psychosocial hazards which can create psychological risks to workers.

Employers have safety obligations to eliminate or minimise such risks so far as reasonably practicable. A failure to manage such risks may lead to poor morale and mental health which may in turn result in a compensable psychological injury.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Commission finds inappropriate social media use formed valid reason for dismissal

Message delivered

A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed that an employee’s inappropriate use of social media group chats may form a valid reason for dismissal, particularly when matters relating to work are discussed.

Read more...

Employer found liable for workers compensation despite worker’s unreasonable perceptions

Fact or fiction

A recent decision of the New South Wales Personal Injury Commission serves as a reminder of the differing standards of proof when determining liability for claims of bullying and/or harassment under workers compensation laws and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

"You need to calm down" - Managing workplace behaviour

In this webinar, we tackle the challenges faced by employers when it comes to managing workplace behaviour, and discuss a range of interesting issues which can occur in both the traditional and hybrid workplace.

Read more...

Employer successfully rebuts presumption in adverse action claim

Return to sender

An employer has successfully defended an adverse action claim brought by a former employee as the court was satisfied that the employee was not dismissed for a prohibited reason.

Read more...

Commission finds inappropriate social media use formed valid reason for dismissal

Message delivered

A recent decision of the Fair Work Commission has confirmed that an employee’s inappropriate use of social media group chats may form a valid reason for dismissal, particularly when matters relating to work are discussed.

Read more...

Commission confirms inappropriate touching constituted sexual harassment warranting summary dismissal

‘Scuse you

Sexual harassment in the workplace has been the subject of significant reform over the past few years, with an even greater onus on employers now to take proactive measures to minimise or eliminate the risk of sexual harassment in connection with work.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.