Resources: Blogs

I knew you were trouble

Blogs
|

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs) have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

WorkSafe Victoria was recently successful in its prosecution of a printing company and its director for breaches of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act) for the bullying of a subcontractor.

Printco (Aust) Pty Ltd was charged with failing to provide and maintain systems of work that are safe and without risks to health in breach of the OHS Act. The employer’s director was also separately charged as an officer for failing to take reasonable care.

For over four years the subcontractor was subject to verbal abuse, intimidation and threats by the director which caused the subcontractor to suffer anxiety and develop a mental injury and as a result was not able to work. One particular incident occurred in August 2021 where the director was abusive, yelled and swore at the subcontractor over the phone when he questioned working during COVID-19 lockdowns.

A subsequent investigation conducted by Worksafe Victoria uncovered that other workers had also been subjected to bullying behaviour by the director.

In the Victorian Magistrates Court, Worksafe Victoria set out that the employer’s anti-bullying policy and procedures were lacking, in particular because they did not provide:

  • information about how to report inappropriate workplace behaviour;
  • definitions or examples of bullying; and
  • workers with any anti-bullying training.

Worksafe Victoria maintained that it was reasonably practicable for the employer and the director to provide and maintain a safe system of work for identifying, reporting, investigating and stopping inappropriate workplace behaviour, including workplace bullying.

Both the employer and the director pleaded guilty and each were fined by the Victorian Magistrate Court $20,000 (total of $40,000) and ordered to pay $9,309 in costs.

Lessons for persons conducting a business or undertaking

Bullying and harassment are psychosocial hazards which can lead to psychological injury. PCBUs have a work health and safety duty to eliminate, and if that is not possible, to minimise psychosocial risks so far as reasonably practicable. It is essential that employers have in place, at a minimum, clear policies and system of work in place in relation to preventing workplace bullying and to conduct anti-bullying training.

As this prosecution highlights, PCBUs and individuals – including officers and other workers can be prosecuted resulting in criminal convictions and penalties for work health and safety breaches.

Information provided in this blog is not legal adviceand should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liabilityfor any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, orfrom links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liabilityis limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

FWC upholds summary dismissal of employee who refused to provide medical information confirming fitness to work

If you refuse you lose

Where there are concerns about an employee’s fitness to work, employers may rely on terms in their employment contract which require the employee to comply with the reasonable and lawful direction to undergo a medical assessment.

Read more...

QIRC rejects unfair dismissal claim due to clear evidence of misconduct

Swear by it

Employers have a responsibility to address and manage poor conduct and behaviour which may expose other workers to work health and safety risks in the workplace. Implementation of effective disciplinary processes are vital in curbing such risks that may lead to a poor workplace culture, which may in turn create psychosocial hazards.

Read more...

Third maximum term contract role not substantially similar work

Not the same

Amendments to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) limiting the use of fixed term and maximum term contracts prohibit employers from providing employees with successive term contracts, unless an exception applies.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required