Resources: Blogs

I knew you were trouble

Blogs
|

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking (PCBUs) have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

WorkSafe Victoria was recently successful in its prosecution of a printing company and its director for breaches of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (OHS Act) for the bullying of a subcontractor.

Printco (Aust) Pty Ltd was charged with failing to provide and maintain systems of work that are safe and without risks to health in breach of the OHS Act. The employer’s director was also separately charged as an officer for failing to take reasonable care.

For over four years the subcontractor was subject to verbal abuse, intimidation and threats by the director which caused the subcontractor to suffer anxiety and develop a mental injury and as a result was not able to work. One particular incident occurred in August 2021 where the director was abusive, yelled and swore at the subcontractor over the phone when he questioned working during COVID-19 lockdowns.

A subsequent investigation conducted by Worksafe Victoria uncovered that other workers had also been subjected to bullying behaviour by the director.

In the Victorian Magistrates Court, Worksafe Victoria set out that the employer’s anti-bullying policy and procedures were lacking, in particular because they did not provide:

  • information about how to report inappropriate workplace behaviour;
  • definitions or examples of bullying; and
  • workers with any anti-bullying training.

Worksafe Victoria maintained that it was reasonably practicable for the employer and the director to provide and maintain a safe system of work for identifying, reporting, investigating and stopping inappropriate workplace behaviour, including workplace bullying.

Both the employer and the director pleaded guilty and each were fined by the Victorian Magistrate Court $20,000 (total of $40,000) and ordered to pay $9,309 in costs.

Lessons for persons conducting a business or undertaking

Bullying and harassment are psychosocial hazards which can lead to psychological injury. PCBUs have a work health and safety duty to eliminate, and if that is not possible, to minimise psychosocial risks so far as reasonably practicable. It is essential that employers have in place, at a minimum, clear policies and system of work in place in relation to preventing workplace bullying and to conduct anti-bullying training.

As this prosecution highlights, PCBUs and individuals – including officers and other workers can be prosecuted resulting in criminal convictions and penalties for work health and safety breaches.

Information provided in this blog is not legal adviceand should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liabilityfor any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, orfrom links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liabilityis limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Similar articles

Court finds sole director failed to exercise due diligence in fatality prosecution

The Model Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) imposes a positive duty on officers to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking complies with its work health and safety duties and obligations.

Read more...

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

Read more...

Commission finds employer’s unsubstantiated allegations rendered dismissal unfair

Not mushroom for error

Where there is a factual dispute about allegations made against an employee, employers must ensure that the allegations are properly tested before proceeding to a disciplinary process. This will ensure that the employee has been provided with procedural fairness and any reasons relied on by the employer as grounds for dismissal are valid.

Read more...

High Court rules on scope of inquiry of redeployment within an employers enterprise

That’s not how this works

In “Where does it end?” we looked at the decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia in Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley [2024] FCAFC 45. In that decision, the Full Federal Court refused an application from an employer seeking orders to quash previous decisions and compel the Fair Work Commission from further dealing with unfair dismissal applications lodged by employees who had been made redundant.

Read more...

Mad Mex franchisee to pay $305,000 in damages for sexual harassment claim

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) protects employees from sexual harassment, and as part of the Respect@Work amendments now prohibits sex-based harassment.

Read more...

FWC rejects constructive dismissal claim, finding the employment ended by “mutual agreement”

Mutually beneficial

For an employee to have access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that the employee was “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required