Resources: Blogs

Out on the Full

Blogs
|

AFL Club fined for Work Health and Safety Breaches

Last year the Essendon Football Club was charged with breaches of the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 in relation to the Club’s controversial supplements program by WorkSafe Victoria.

Last year the Essendon Football Club (the Club) was charged with breaches of the Victorian Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic) (the OHS Act) in relation to the Club’s controversial supplements program by WorkSafe Victoria.

In early 2013, it was announced that the Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and the World Anti-Doping Authority had investigated the Club regarding the nature of the Club’s supplements program in 2011 and 2012.

It was alleged that the players were injected with banned and / or experimental substances as part of the program. For their part, the players claimed innocence and that they did not know what they were being injected with.

The Club pleaded guilty to the two charges of breaching section 21 of the OHS Act (the duty of care that employers owe employees) in the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in late January 2016. Specifically, the Club was charged with failing, so far as reasonably practicable, to:

  • Provide and maintain a working environment that is safe and without risks to health; and
  • Provide and maintain for employees a system of work that is safe and without risks to health.

The Club was convicted of the charges and fined a total of $200,000 for breaches of the OHS Act. The Club was also ordered to pay $20,000 for WorkSafe Victoria’s costs.

WorkSafe Victoria’s prosecution against the Club indicate that just like any other business, sporting organisations (professional or otherwise) have obligations to ensure the health and safety of its employees whilst at work, even if their workplace is a sporting field.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Industrial manslaughter offence introduced in New South Wales

On 20 June 2024, the New South Wales Parliament passed legislation to include a new criminal offence of industrial manslaughter under work health and safety legislation.

Read more...

Safety regulator strategy focuses on psychosocial risks

Earlier this month, SafeWork NSW announced a three-year work health and safety strategy focusing on psychological health and safety.

Read more...

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Read more...

First Intractable bargaining order made by the Full Bench

How did it end?

Enterprise agreement making under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires bargaining representatives to bargain in good faith. Under the Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Act 2022 (Cth), the Fair Work Commission was provided with new powers to arbitrate and issue a workplace determination to resolve intractable disputes about terms and conditions of proposed enterprise agreement in circumstances where there are no reasonable prospects of the parties reaching an agreement.

Read more...

Federal Court finds employee was not demoted due to his exercise of workplace rights

The final decision

Employees are protected from adverse action because they have exercised, or propose to exercise, the workplace right to make a “complaint” or “inquiry” in relation to their employment within the meaning of section 341(1)(c)(ii) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Employer successfully rebuts presumption in adverse action claim

Return to sender

An employer has successfully defended an adverse action claim brought by a former employee as the court was satisfied that the employee was not dismissed for a prohibited reason.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.