Resources: Blogs

Puddle trouble

Blogs
|

$275,000 damages bill flows from shallow puddle injury

During the recruitment process, employers want to present their best side to prospective employees in order to entice top talent to join them. Employers can potentially expose themselves to litigation for representations made or made on their behalf that are misleading and deceptive and later relied upon by prospective employees in the recruitment process.

In a recent decision of the Victorian County Court, a university has been ordered to pay $275,000 in damages to a security control room operator who worked on the university campus (Savage v Monash University and Programmed Maintenance Services Ltd [2017] VCC 1774).

The control room operator was walking from her car to the security control room in steel capped boots when she stepped through a puddle onto the uneven surface below and injured her ankle. The ankle injury required arthroscopic surgery, after which the control room operator developed a chronic pain condition and depression, and became incapacitated for work.

The location where the injury occurred was a wide section of a median strip separating two roads on the university’s campus. The section of the median strip was designated for pedestrians crossing the roads and was surfaced with a crushed granite/gravel material. On the particular day in question, rain water had pooled in sections of the median strip surface, creating puddles. The depth of those puddles was not immediately ascertainable nor was the state of the surface at the bottom of the puddles.

The control room operator stepped in a puddle, that was said to be two centimetres deep at the most, and rolled her ankle.

The Court found that the University had a responsibility to the 5000 plus students, staff and other visitors who used the crossing in question every day. The university had failed to ensure that the surface of the median strip crossing was properly maintained given its susceptibility to degradation and previous, though undocumented, instances of trips and falls.

The potential seriousness of any injury resulting from the uneven surface and the University’s failure to either fill-in ditches in the uneven surface, or replace the uneven surface with a permanent all-weather surface (like concrete) lead to a finding that its duty of care to those using the crossing had not been discharged.

The Court found the university liable for the control room operator’s injury and ordered that she be paid $275,000 in damages.

 

Lessons

Under common law and statute, employers have a responsibility to make sure that the working environment and any premises they maintain are safe for employees, clients and any other visitors.

Employers must take all reasonable steps necessary to ensure that even the smallest hazards are identified and addressed as and when they are identified (ideally through regular risk and safety audits).

In this case, the hazard of small puddles concealing an uneven surface from pedestrians was not obvious when the median strip crossing was dry. It was not until rain water pooled and created puddles that an obvious hazard developed.

Learning from this example, employers should consider how weather conditions or other environmental changes may impact on their premises or workplace and how such changes could result in previously minor hazards becoming significant hazards.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Court finds sole director failed to exercise due diligence in fatality prosecution

The Model Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) imposes a positive duty on officers to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking complies with its work health and safety duties and obligations.

Read more...

Managing ill and injured workers

In her usual entertaining and informative style, our Managing Director and Principal, Athena Koelmeyer, will guide employers through the tangled web of legislative obligations they face when dealing with an ill or injured employee.

Read more...

Sole trader convicted and fined for WHS breach resulting in death of worker

In a recent decision of the NSW District Court, a sole trader has been convicted and fined $100,000 for breaching his health and safety duty under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth), which resulted in workers being exposed to a risk of death or serious injury.

Read more...

FWC rejects constructive dismissal claim, finding the employment ended by “mutual agreement”

Mutually beneficial

For an employee to have access to the unfair dismissal jurisdiction, the Fair Work Commission must be satisfied that the employee was “dismissed” from their employment within the meaning of section 386(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Court finds sole director failed to exercise due diligence in fatality prosecution

The Model Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) imposes a positive duty on officers to exercise due diligence to ensure the person conducting a business or undertaking complies with its work health and safety duties and obligations.

Read more...

Tribunal finds employee’s refusal to undergo independent medical examination rendered dismissal fair

Check-up or check out

Where there are concerns about an employee’s capacity to work, it is prudent for employers to obtain medical advice confirming whether the employee can safely perform the inherent requirements of their role. This may include requiring the employee to undergo an independent medical examination.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required