Resources: Blogs

It’s all in the mind

Blogs
|

Psychological and psychometric testing in the workplace

Recently, the South Australian government announced that two of its employees engaged as carers were found unsuitable to work with children, following the introduction of a new testing and screening process involving psychological testing.

Recently, the South Australian government announced that two of its employees engaged as carers were found unsuitable to work with children, following the introduction of a new testing and screening process involving psychological testing.

The new tests were introduced following the recommendations of the State’s Child Protection Systems Royal Commission report. As a result, all new applicants for positions as carers in South Australian residential care facilities are now required to undergo this testing. As at October 2017, 227 out of 350 existing carers had reportedly undergone the testing.

Whilst the testing regime has been introduced obviously with the intentions of protecting the interests of children in residential care, concerns have arisen as to the ramifications of the testing for employees (and prospective employees), particularly where it is found that they are not suitable to work with children.

The testing and screening process involves a face-to-face interview with a psychologist and is reported to include some rigorous questioning.

Of the two employees found unsuitable to work with children in a residential care environment by the South Australian government, one has been moved to an administration role, while the other is reported to be on extended leave.

This testing regime raises some interesting questions about the value of psychological testing for employers.

 

How much weight should employers give to psychometric and psychological testing?

Psychometric testing is a common tool used by recruiters to assess a candidate’s capabilities and behavioural tendencies. Candidates are usually sent a series of questions and, depending on their answers, are designated a particular category distinguished by certain characteristics.

Psychological testing usually involves a more in-depth interview-type process with a qualified professional who produces a report for an employer.

Before engaging in any kind of psychological or psychometric testing, employers should have a clear idea about what they are trying to achieve by requiring candidates or employees to be tested. If there is any uncertainty about the purpose of the testing or whether the objective can reasonably be achieved, psychological or psychometric testing may not be an appropriate recruiting tool for that employer.

Where there is a clear purpose, employers must then consider the method of testing and how much weight will be placed on the results.

If the testing has been conducted to assess an individual’s mental fitness to perform their duties, then the opinion of a qualified and experienced medical professional will be highly significant.

If, on the other hand, psychometric testing is more of a recruitment formality then it is unlikely to be determinative and may even be redundant.

 

Final comments

In summary – the appropriateness of psychological and psychometric testing should be carefully considered by an employer before any testing commences.

Employers should consider whether the testing is necessary in the first place and how much weight will be given to test results.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Hiring in the Hybrid Workplace

The first of our 2022 webinars focused on the employment 'life cycle'. This webinar will cover key legal and HR issues to consider throughout the recruitment process.

Read more...

Court finds rescinded job offer was not age discrimination

The rooster and the sunrise

Discrimination in the workplace is unlawful under a number of Australian laws, including state and federal anti-discrimination legislation (such as the Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth)) as well as the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

Read more...

How a region banded together to improve employment standards

Group Effort

No employer operates in a silo – all employers operate in complex systems of interrelated stakeholders including employees, customers, other businesses, and regulators who enforce the laws that apply to the employer and their business.

Read more...

FWO secures penalties against bar operator and external accounting firm

Closing time

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) requires employers to keep certain employee records for a period of 7 years. These records are necessary to ensure that employees have been paid their minimum entitlements should an underpayment claim be made.

Read more...

Employer found liable for workers compensation despite worker’s unreasonable perceptions

Fact or fiction

A recent decision of the New South Wales Personal Injury Commission serves as a reminder of the differing standards of proof when determining liability for claims of bullying and/or harassment under workers compensation laws and the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

Read more...

Commission finds employee’s flexible working request to work entirely from home was not reasonable

The worst has now passed

One of the many changes to the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) introduced this year include the Fair Work Commission’s new powers to deal with disputes relating to requests for flexible working arrangements.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.