Resources: Blogs

I smell a rat

Blogs
|

The new FWO anonymous tip-off service

The Fair Work Ombudsman has announced a new anonymous tip-off service aimed at encouraging the general public to report businesses that they suspect are doing the wrong thing by employees.

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) has announced a new anonymous tip-off service aimed at encouraging the general public to report businesses that they suspect are doing the wrong thing by employees.

The service is intended to provide a comfortable way for employees to report workplace issues without opening themselves up to repercussions from their employers. It also provides other parties with the opportunity to report non-compliant businesses in circumstances where they don’t wish to be identified or don’t want to get directly involved.

The FWO has highlighted the information gathering function of the service, saying that it will use anonymous reports to identify trends and patterns in an effort to zone in on compliance areas to “follow up”.

However, the full scope of the service is yet to be fully understood and the FWO has flagged that it expects the service to evolve over time.

FWO Natalie James has said the agency will not “be storming into a business on the basis of one anonymous tip off”, but what remains unclear is whether multiple tip-offs will result in any kind of FWO action. Each report must clearly identify the business it relates to, yet the FWO has said that it will not treat anonymous reports like requests for assistance or provide any response to tippers. Furthermore, the FWO website says that anonymous reports will be used to plan current and future education and enforcement activities. So whilst gathering information is clearly one of the service’s main functions, whether reports will result in an FWO inquiry is less clear.

One concern is the likelihood of anonymous reports being made based on misunderstandings. The workplace relations system in Australia is complex and it’s easy for employees or third parties to misunderstand their entitlements or to misinterpret a situation. How will the FWO deal with mistaken complaints or worse, ‘witch hunts’ by disgruntled employees (or groups of them)?

Ultimately, the service shouldn’t be necessary if employers are doing the right thing and as Ms James has pointed out, most businesses are trying to do the right thing. In light of this, we would hope that the tip-off service should be used for nothing other than information gathering to help develop compliance and education programs.

We will be watching this space as the service evolves.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Workplace bullying and reasonable management action

Just Managing

Workplace bullying can be extremely serious and should not be tolerated by employers.

Read more...

Casual swearing no excuse for conduct

A little less conversational swearing

There is no doubt that swearing in the workplace is unacceptable - the Fair Work Commission (FWC) has repeatedly held that swearing in an abusive manner that is directed towards others is a valid reason for dismissal.

Read more...

How a region banded together to improve employment standards

Group Effort

No employer operates in a silo – all employers operate in complex systems of interrelated stakeholders including employees, customers, other businesses, and regulators who enforce the laws that apply to the employer and their business.

Read more...

Federal Court dismisses appeal against mobile phone right of entry refusal

Payphone

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) sets out the union right of entry to entitlements and requirements. The right of entry provisions are intended to draw a balance between the right of organisations to represent their members and the right of employers and occupiers to operate without undue inconvenience.

Read more...

Full Federal Court rejects employers bid to quash decision which found employees were not genuinely redundant

Where does it end?

Section 389(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides that a dismissal will not be a case of “genuine redundancy” if it “would have been reasonable in all of the circumstances” for the employee to be redeployed within the employer’s enterprise or the enterprise of an associated entity.

Read more...

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.