Resources: Blogs

Instant messaging – The do’s and don’ts

Blogs
|

Office online instant messaging services: The do’s and don’ts

The “digital water cooler”, where co-workers are able to have informal conversations instantaneously without the worry that their conversations will be saved, is an attractive proposition for many modern workplaces.

The “digital water cooler”, where co-workers are able to have informal conversations instantaneously without the worry that their conversations will be saved, is an attractive proposition for many modern workplaces.

There are now plenty on online instant messaging providers who are now offering a mixture of additional features such as the ability to upload images, videos and even voice messages.

Generally speaking, these communications are not recorded on the organisation’s server or backed up.

The absence of a record of those conversations can cause employees to feel that they are able to speak without care and engage in inappropriate conduct which could be considered as harassment (sexual or otherwise), discrimination and/or bullying.

Some handy tips for employers who utilise online instant messaging services in the workplace are:

  • include protocols for office chat use in a workplace policy making it clear that inappropriate conduct and/or use can lead to disciplinary action;
  • remind employees that it is incorrect to assume that these chat platforms can be used without the risk of their messages being recorded/saved. For example, someone can take a screen shot of the messages, a photo of the message or even print them out in good old fashioned hard copy or upload them to another social media site such as Facebook.

This cautionary blog is a reminder to employers who provide/use instant messaging to consider regulating the usage of the system and also to employees not to assume that something said in an instant message will not be captured by someone else in another format – even if the system does not make a record itself.

As more communications in the workplace become of the online variety, employers’ policies will need to be agile enough to move with those times to outline acceptable workplace behaviour – in any format.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

No items found.

Similar articles

No items found.

No items found.

Federal Circuit Court dismisses employee’s application for costs

At what cost

Workplace Law recently represented an employer in defending an application for costs before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia which was decided in favour of our client.

Read more...

Employee entitlement to be absent on public holidays

Santa can say no

Section 114 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides an entitlement for an employee to be absent from their employment on a public holiday. This section also provides that an employer may ask an employee to work on a public holiday, but that the employee may refuse the request under certain circumstances.

Read more...

The “practical reality” test confirms that an individual was an employee and not an independent contractor

Game over

The Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) was amended last year to introduce a new test for determining if an individual is an employee or an independent contractor.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in workplace law and sports law.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.

Subscribe

* indicates required