Resources: Blogs

A Policy of Truth

Blogs
|

Why employers should carry out pre-employment checks

It is all too tempting for job hunters to do: lie on a resume to secure THAT job. Employers may be left red faced however when their recent star recruit doesn’t actually have the qualification/s required or the previous experience as they claimed – and it is only discovered after they have accepted the job and commenced work.

It is all too tempting for job hunters to do: lie on a resume to secure THAT job. Employers may be left red faced however when their recent star recruit doesn’t actually have the qualification/s required or the previous experience as they claimed – and it is only discovered after they have accepted the job and commenced work.

This scenario is what eventuated at an Australian department store in 2014. It discovered that a new senior level employee had lied about his previous retail management experience. The employee’s employment was promptly terminated and following a police investigation, he was later charged with a number of deception charges.

Conducting pre-employment checks of a candidate’s qualification or work history is a step that all employers must take in their recruitment processes, particularly for senior level positions.

Employers should ask candidates to provide original and/or certified copies of certificates or academic transcripts. Where this cannot be done, employers should consider contacting the issuing educational institution or professional body to verify the claimed qualification and/or membership. This is particularly important for positions that have a financial responsibility or a responsibility for safety. Consider for example, an engineer who is responsible for designing and / or checking the safety of bridges but never finished the degree or a real estate agent who does not have a licence.

Employers are also reminded that membership of an association or professional body should not be relied as evidence of a candidate’s qualification or current membership status. For example, the applicant may be banned, disqualified or their membership may have lapsed.

A candidate’s work history should not be relied upon as evidence of their actual experience. For example, just because an applicant has claimed on their resume that they worked as an Accountant at Company X does not mean they actually did so or have the necessary professional body membership. Often, all it takes is a simple phone call with previous employers to confirm the previous position and period of employment.

 

To minimise the risk of hiring a dishonest candidate and to ensure due diligence, employers should consider:

  • Implementing pre-employment screening checks as a standard part of the application process.
  • Candidates should affirm that the information they have provided is true and correct and consent to the business carrying out employment and qualification checks. The Standards Australia Employment Screening Standard provides guidelines for employers and agencies carrying out the process.
  • Where a recruiter is used, even if they have conducted their own screening process, employers should still rely on their own enquiries to verify qualifications, references and work history or have involvement in the questions that need to be asked - sometimes it is the way things are said that reveals the truth.
  • Having carefully drafted employment contracts which specify that possession of the relevant qualification is a condition of employment and that an employee’s employment may be terminated if references, licences and qualifications are not valid and true and correct.

Having a thorough recruitment process where appropriate measures are taken to verify qualifications and experience will help to ensure that the best person for the job is selected for your business and avoid potential embarrassment for the organisation in the future.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Hiring in the Hybrid Workplace

The first of our 2022 webinars focused on the employment 'life cycle'. This webinar will cover key legal and HR issues to consider throughout the recruitment process.

Read more...

Court finds rescinded job offer was not age discrimination

The rooster and the sunrise

Discrimination in the workplace is unlawful under a number of Australian laws, including state and federal anti-discrimination legislation (such as the Age Discrimination Act 2004 (Cth)) as well as the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

Read more...

How a region banded together to improve employment standards

Group Effort

No employer operates in a silo – all employers operate in complex systems of interrelated stakeholders including employees, customers, other businesses, and regulators who enforce the laws that apply to the employer and their business.

Read more...

Full Federal Court rejects employers bid to quash decision which found employees were not genuinely redundant

Where does it end?

Section 389(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides that a dismissal will not be a case of “genuine redundancy” if it “would have been reasonable in all of the circumstances” for the employee to be redeployed within the employer’s enterprise or the enterprise of an associated entity.

Read more...

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Read more...

Victoria records first workplace manslaughter conviction

Various Australian jurisdictions have been slowly introducing an offence of industrial manslaughter, dealing with workplace fatalities that arise as a result of negligent conduct by a person conducting a business or undertaking or its officers.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.