Resources: Blogs

Clarity

Blogs
|

FWC decision reminds employers about the need to be clear about termination dates

Fair Work Commission’s (FWC) Full Bench decision in Mohammed Ayub v NSW Trains [2016] FWCFB 5500 (Ayub Case) is a good reminder for employers about the need for clarity with respect to termination of employment and in particular when a termination is to take effect.

Fair Work Commission’s (FWC) Full Bench decision in Mohammed Ayub v NSW Trains [2016] FWCFB 5500 (Ayub Case) is a good reminder for employers about the need for clarity with respect to termination of employment and in particular when a termination is to take effect.

Mr Ayub lodged an application for unfair dismissal and there was a dispute between the parties as to the correct date of termination of employment. This was significant in terms of determining whether or not Mr Ayub was outside the 21 day time limit under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) for lodging an unfair dismissal application and whether the FWC had jurisdiction to hear the matter.

The FWC Full Bench stated that the “general principle” is that an employer must communicate to the employee using both plain language and show by conduct that the contract is terminated. Where communication is in writing, it must have been received by the employee in order for the termination to be effective.

In the Ayub Case, Mr Ayub was sent an email by NSW Trains on 18 January 2016 to his wife’s email address. Mr Ayub was not aware of his dismissal until 19 January 2016 when he saw and opened the email. The Full Bench found that Mr Ayub’s dismissal did not take effect earlier than 18 January 2016, despite NSW Trains making the decision on 14 January 2016, and the letter being dated 14 January 2016.

Employers are reminded of the following best practice tips as a result of the Ayub Case:

  • Specify how the letter is delivered to the employee (whether it is “by hand”, “by express post” etc). In the Ayub Case the letter was sent by email but was headed “delivered by hand”;
  • If a termination letter is sent to an employee in the post – make sure it is registered or couriered so that there is some evidence that the employee received the letter. In the Ayub Case the FWC made it clear that mere delivery of a document to an employee’s usual address would not constitute communication of a dismissal;
  • If an employer is sending the letter by email make sure a read receipt and delivery receipt is attached. It is worthwhile to make sure you have a current email address. It is also sensible to call the employee to let them know you have sent them an email;
  • If an employee is unable to be found, contact the next of kin for contact details of the employee or use other methods to determine their whereabouts (social media is often helpful);
  • Where an employee is dismissed with notice, the dismissal would take effect upon the last date of the notice period. This date must be clearly identified;
  • Where a dismissal is payment in lieu of notice, the dismissal must be clearly communicated to the employee so that he or she at least has a reasonable chance to find out that he or she has been dismissed.

A definite termination date, clearly communicated to an employee, will be of assistance when applications are made for unfair dismissal or adverse action where a strict time limit applies.

 

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

 

Similar articles

Failure to warn employee renders dismissal unfair

Template lesson

Many businesses, and in particular small businesses employers subscribe to human resources information systems which offer access to template letters and policies to provide a ready-made solution or to manage human resources administration.

Read more...

Employer’s withdrawal of role constituted dismissal from employment

Late withdrawal

For most employers, casual employment is favoured because of the flexibility it provides – employees are employed as required and have no guarantee of ongoing employment. This flexibility however does not mean that casual employees are not protected from adverse action.

Read more...

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.

Read more...

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

Read more...

Victoria records first workplace manslaughter conviction

Various Australian jurisdictions have been slowly introducing an offence of industrial manslaughter, dealing with workplace fatalities that arise as a result of negligent conduct by a person conducting a business or undertaking or its officers.

Read more...

Court sends clear message to employers on having adequate systems, processes and checks in place to avoid underpayments

Down in flames

The Federal Court of Australia has handed down a record $10.34 million in penalties against two related entities for various contraventions of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) resulting in substantial underpayments.

Read more...

Let's talk

please contact our directors to discuss how ouR expertise can help your business.

We're here to help

Contact Us
Let Workplace Law become your partner in Workplace Relations.

Sign up to receive the latest industry updates with commentary from the Workplace Law team direct to your inbox.