[No] ticket to drive – A lesson for employers | Blogs

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence

Blogs

July 20, 2015

[No] ticket to drive – A lesson for employers

In the recent case of Mr Christopher K v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 3967 the Fair Work Commission confirmed that there will be a valid reason for the termination of an employee’s employment where they are unable to perform the inherent requirements of their position.

In the recent case of Mr Christopher K v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 3967 the Fair Work Commission confirmed that there will be a valid reason for the termination of an employee’s employment where they are unable to perform the inherent requirements of their position.

In this matter, Mr K was employed as a full-time truck driver for Linfox at its Newcastle site. Earlier this year, whilst driving his own vehicle, Mr K was charged with, and later pleaded guilty to a mid-range driving offence. Mr K’s request to use his leave or be redeployed to another position to cover the 8 month licence suspension period was refused. Linfox terminated Mr K’s employment on the basis that as a truck driver, he was unable to perform the inherent requirements of his position because of the loss of his licence.

The Fair Work Commission (FWC) agreed that Mr K’s inability to perform the inherent requirements of his position was a valid reason for the termination and found that his dismissal was not unfair, unjust or unreasonable in the circumstances. The FWC considered that it was not unreasonable for Linfox to determine that it was unable to accommodate Mr K for the 8 month suspension period until he was able to return to his duties.

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence – particularly when it is for an extended period of time but it is important to be able to demonstrate:

How the inability of the employee to drive (due to the drivers’ licence suspension) means he/she can’t fulfil the inherent requirements of the position.

Why it is not reasonable to accommodate the employee by making changes in the workplace (this may also include consideration of the duration of any drivers’ licence suspension). In looking at this an employer will need to consider whether the employee can be redeployed to another worksite, department/area or position or whether the driving duties be assigned to another employee.

Information provided in this blog is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Workplace Law does not accept liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on the content of this blog, or from links on this website to any external website. Where applicable, liability is limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

Failure to warn employee renders dismissal unfair

Template lesson

Many businesses, and in particular small businesses employers subscribe to human resources information systems which offer access to template letters and policies to provide a ready-made solution or to manage human resources administration.

October 24, 2023

Blogs

Employer’s withdrawal of role constituted dismissal from employment

Late withdrawal

For most employers, casual employment is favoured because of the flexibility it provides – employees are employed as required and have no guarantee of ongoing employment. This flexibility however does not mean that casual employees are not protected from adverse action.

August 9, 2023

Blogs

Employee’s exaggerated complaints created psychosocial risk

False alarm

Employers have work health and safety obligations to eliminate or minimise psychosocial risks in the workplace so far as is reasonably practicable. These risks arise from psychosocial hazards including conflict or poor workplace relationships.

August 8, 2023

Full Federal Court rejects employers bid to quash decision which found employees were not genuinely redundant

Where does it end?

Section 389(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides that a dismissal will not be a case of “genuine redundancy” if it “would have been reasonable in all of the circumstances” for the employee to be redeployed within the employer’s enterprise or the enterprise of an associated entity.

April 24, 2024

Blogs

Bullying prosecution leads to conviction and fine for company and its director

I knew you were trouble

Under work health and safety legislation, persons conducting a business or undertaking have duties to ensure, so far as reasonably practicable the health and safety of workers in the workplace. It is also accepted that workplace bullying is a risk to health and safety of workers which needs to be managed as any other health and safety risk.

April 11, 2024

Blogs

Victoria records first workplace manslaughter conviction

Various Australian jurisdictions have been slowly introducing an offence of industrial manslaughter, dealing with workplace fatalities that arise as a result of negligent conduct by a person conducting a business or undertaking or its officers.

April 11, 2024

Resources: Blogs

Employers are often in a difficult position when requested by employees to accommodate the loss or suspension of their drivers’ licence